2018-10-04 Resource Access Meeting Notes
Date
Oct 4, 2018
Attendees
Andrea Loigman
Joanne Leary
Emma Boettcher
Mark Canney
Jana Freytag
David Bottorff
William Weare
Rameka Barnes
Cheryl Malmborg
sthomas (Deactivated)
Wendy Wilcox
Kimie Kester
Sharon Wiles-Young
David Larsen
Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
Darcy Branchini
Anya
Adam Shire
Kai Sprenger
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5min | Housekeeping | Andrea Loigman |
|
10min | Recently returned & shelving lag time | Emma Boettcher |
|
45min | Item states display (discussion) | Emma Boettcher |
|
Notes
Shelving lag time – should be configured with the service location.
Item Status – comprised of three components (availability, needed for, process); how to display?
Show availability status
Show ‘Needed for’ component next to availability, with links out other apps (if possible)
Show ‘Process,’ with links out to other apps (if possible)
Show dates applied next to each component
In showing the data associated with all the item status components, we must keep in mind the need to minimize visual clutter. When is it desirable (or necessary) to show less information in the interests of reducing visual clutter?
On the Check in screen
On the Loans list screen (don’t need to see process component). On the open loans screen, we can select which columns to display (which should reduce clutter) but we can’t yet re-sequence the columns.
We would like availability and process separated; if this presents design difficulties, we can revisit. This principle should apply to all screens for consistency.
How much info to display for ‘needed for’? Might want format type/loan type (?). Also, only the first ‘needed for’ should be displayed, with an ellipsis (or other clickable indicator) to get to remaining needed-for entries.