2023-06-29 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Jun 29, 2023

@Elizabeth Chenette

@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee

@julie.bickle

@Erin Weller

@Thomas Trutt

@Magnus Andersson

@Martina Tumulla

@Christine Tobias

@Laurence Mini

Tracy Macpherson

@Kimie Kester

@lisa perchermeier

@Dwayne Swigert

@Olga Kalachinskaya

@Paivi Rentz

@mey

@Jana Freytag

Time	Item	Who	Description	Goals/Info/notes

Time	Item	Who	Description	Goals/Info/notes
5min	Administrivia	@Jana Freytag	WOLFCon Sessions WOLFCon23 topics Erin is still looking for folks to take over roles - please consider and reach out! documentation working group representative service points and locations product owner bulk edit working group member	@lisa perchermeier
40 Min	Notices Continuation from Monday	@julie.bickle	Present the (Poppy?) lastest notice development + ask a few questions on some things I have found: UXPROD-3573 - Notify user when item(s) are charged aged to lost (automated f/f) with ACTUAL COST / Scheduled notices Closed UXPROD-3740 - Notify user when item is returned, and ACTUAL COST gets cancelled / Scheduled notices Closed UXPROD-3998 - Bundle aged to lost fee/fines into a single notice (“Multiples”) when charging: Overnight Closed UXPROD-3999 - Bundle overdue fines into a single notice (“Multiples”) when charging: At check-in In progress
15Min	fee/fines	@Thomas Trutt	Tom via Slack: Q: and we can maybe chat about it today.. Im working on a workflow for fines that are rejected by our bursar's office. In order to move fines back to 'active' you have to 'refund' the fine.. Does this make sense or is it a gap.
	other topics		@Thomas Trutt made the group arware of this Inventory bug

WOLFcon: 2 RA meetings: A general SIG Meeting and one for TLR
Erin is still looking for someone to take over roles mentioned in the agenda, please reach out if you have questions

Multiple fees/fines for overdue items

UXPROD-3999 (complete - no longer in progress)

1^st scenario

Bundling at the point of check in overdue items
Trigger (overdue returned in the notice policy): At check-in: when an item is checked in that is overdue and fees/fines are generated in accordance to the settings in the respective overdue fine policy
Notice: everything you write between the multiples tokens is duplicated
All overdue fines that are created in one session are bundled into one notice
Question Thomas: What happens if a session never ends. Julie keeps on testing to be 100 per cent sure and checked back with developers: The notice will definitely get send (sessions gets cancelled at a certain point)
Breaking change (Julie will highlight in the release notes): Also if only one item with overdue fine is checked in you still need the the multiple tokens in your notice template

2^nd scenario

Bundling at the point of renewal of overdue items
Trigger (overdue, renewed): renewal: when an item that is overdue is renewed and fees/fines are generated in accordance to the settings in the respective overdue fine policy
If a bundle is wanted you need to trigger the renewal of the items that should be included into the bundle at the same time - you need to select the items you want to be renewed from the list of items.
Trigger: renewal at the same time (not in the same session)
Julie: the decision was to stick to the behavior you can see on the screen and not to create an extra session somehow only for the bundling
The list of items that were successfully renewed is displayed and the items which are on this list get bundled
Julie noticed while testing that there is no information that a fine was generated (–> that would be a good enhancement)
Breaking change (Julie will highlight in the release notes): Also if only one item with overdue fine is checked in you still need the the multiple tokens in your notice template