2022-06-09 Resource Access Meeting Notes

2022-06-09 Resource Access Meeting Notes

 

Date

Jun 9, 2022

 

Recordings

Find all recordings here: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/resource-access-sig/

Zoom

https://zoom.us/j/337279319 (pw: folio-lsp)

Attendees

@Elizabeth Chenette 

@Andy Horbal 

@Holly Mistlebauer 

@Dwayne Swigert 

@Thomas Trutt 

@Christiane 

@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee 

@Stephanie Buck 

@Erin Weller 

@David Bottorff 

@Martina Tumulla 

@Andrea Loigman

@Rameka Barnes

@julie.bickle

@Laszlo Jakusovszky

@Cheryl Malmborg

@Rebecca Pernell

@Monica Arnold

@Amber Miles 

@Shirley Moentnish 

@Brooks Travis 

@Molly Driscoll 

@Jana Freytag 

 

Discussion Items:

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info/notes

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info/notes

5min

Administrivia

@Jana Freytag 

PC Udates:

Note taker: @Jana Freytag 

 

15Min

WOLFCon Session Planning

@Jana Freytag 

We have:

  • Integration with Discovery, ILL and other external systems (coordinate with FOLIO and Discovery meeting)

  • Implementers view on circ rules

  • RA SIG Working Meeting

  • Circulation in FOLIO

  • we'll come back to this later

  • trying to schedule all the meetings for the afternoon

40Min

Future Fees/Fines: Add option to get Actual Cost for lost item from order

@Stephanie Buck @Holly Mistlebauer 

Preliminary discussions on UXPROD-2245

  • Holly will retire and Steph will take over

Meeting Notes

Future Fees/Fines: Add option to get Actual Cost for lost item from order

  • Not scheduled for the next release cycles

  • Concerns:

    • Erin Nettifee: helpful to visualise this

    • Chat Erin Weller: Has there been discussion about setting the price at a minimum amount that each library can select instead of order price? - If the cost goes over minimum amount (as a set cost) then the actual cost should be charged

    • Chat Thomas Trutt: that is my thought.. Its what our past LMS worked and it was nice.

    • It should be an optional feature

    • Chat Amber Miles: At TAMU we do bill actual cost but automatically billing is not something we do currently.

    • Chat Amber Miles: Nor have we ever done I think.

    • Chat Rebecca Pernell: Future -- FOLIO finds current replacement costs from vendors!

    • Chat Laszlo Jakusovszky: I know Stanford's Science/Eng Libraries are interested in this due to the high price of their texts, esp. as after they go out of print.

    • Chat Andy Horbal: for the same reason.

  • Workflow:

 

 

Patron notices (@julie.bickle)

  • set cost and lost item processing fee are now charged when processed

  • The Lost item processing fee will not be influenced by UXPROD-2245

    • it is triggered by the item status

  • the triggering event for UXPROD-2245 (see also: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-1863) - Bill actual cost in the fee/fine screen

  • by confirming this action a notice to the patron

  • Cheryl: can we bill 0 and should we?

  • A notify patron option would be preferable