2024-05-02 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Meeting time: 11:30 AM ET, 05:30 PM CET, 04:30 PM GMT

Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/527543204 . The meeting password can be found here.

 Date

May 2, 2024

Note taker

Laura Daniels, Lynne Fors, Alissa Hafele, Natascha Owens

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on AWS from 2022 onwards: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/

Discussion items

Item

Presenter

Notes

Item

Presenter

Notes

Announcements



Next week (9 May 2024) Khalilah will be presenting here about MARC validation.

PO Update: Inventory

@Christine Schultz-Richert

 

FOLIO Cataloging Capabilities: Quesnelia updates starting at slide 33

Quesnelia enhancements include: set instance/bib record for deletion, literal dollar signs, LCCN searching, 008 contextual help, authority source for MARC authority records, and bulk edit enhancements. Listed enhancements and bug fixes can be found in the slide deck.

Demo of selected enhancements: LDR and 008 contextual help, LCCN searching in MARC Authority App, HTML page updates, search modifiers in Advanced Search (in MARC Authority app)

Q: Is 008 still sensitive to deleting spaces? Yes, Folio checks the character length.

Investigated approaches for new development such as MARC validation, classification browse, etc. List in slide deck.

Q: Will this change to leader functionality allow for changing workform, e.g., from serial to monograph? Yes, can change the Blvl and it will dynamically change based on selections made in the LDR.

Place of Publication facet

@Christine Schultz-Richert

Main questions:

  • Thoughts on using the 008/15-17 values (mapped to the full value per https://www.loc.gov/marc/countries/countries_code.html ) for this facet

  • If 008/15-17 values are used for the facet, what does this mean for the existing publication place field? Assuming we can’t just replace, since the 260/264 contains more information about the place of publication. New field? Display?

Feedback:

  • Printing dates are important for Special Collections librarians.

  • The 008 field is not granular enough for us. For example, special collections librarians need to be able to find all the title published in Venice or Bologna between 1500 and 1800.

  • Related use case for serials maintenance when publishers change locations within the same country/state.

  • Q: Could these needs be addressed by adding the ability to add custom fields?

    • A (Raegan): No, the information is already in MARC in free text fields. Could allow for more granularity for searching in Lists App.

  • Concerns about adding more facets adding clutter

  • Probably not as useful as a facet, would use more as a search term (+1)

  • Place of publication as an index would be very helpful. Using the 264/260 for the index.

    • Plus an index for publisher

  • In general, everyone very in favor for creating indexes for publisher and place of publication instead of a facet.

  • For an all search, <<publisher all "Venice">> seems to work at least as a stating point. not saying it meets all use cases

  • Query search is powerful but tricky to use. Needs more granularity and documentation.

  • Facet for date makes sense to me. Often you want to filter for resources from a date range, so facet > search

  • Publication year is also really important, and as a date range.

  • Date facet as it currently exists is not the best for publication year.

  • Date delimiters could be customized at tenant level for local needs.

PC updates

@Charlotte Whitt @Jennifer Eustis

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PC/pages/177865748 . This week the PC discussed:

  • How to address questions from the China community. PC is looking to create a small group to reach out to the Chinese community to talk about next steps.

  • State of FOLIO document. The Community Council posted a draft State of FOLIO doc on slack earlier this week. PC discussed this document. Comments can be added to the document.

  • Next week, PC will review the 2023 Things that Could be Better About FOLIO for action items.

BELA (Bulk Edit and Lists App)

Jennifer Eustis

No meeting this week.

Data Import Working Group

Jennifer Eustis

The group continued the discussion on what it means to deduplicate the MARC field 856. If you have ideas or want to join the conversation, feel free to post on Slack in #data-import-batchload.

The next 3 meeting agendas are up for Data Import:

: MARC Modifications

: Set to delete further enhancements discussion

: Reviewing Data Import Topic Tracker Issues with no JIRAs

 

quickMARC Subgroup update

Raegan Wiechert

Did not meet this week. Note: Next week Khalilah will be presenting here about MARC validation.

Chat