Metadata Management Implementers Topics
Please add questions and topics here. Topics or questions posted in slack will be added here as well.
Metadata Management implementation topics, questions or issues
Topic Status legend:
To be discussed
Open
The group is waiting for further information or some specific action to be completed before progress can continue
blocked
Discussion is ongoing and work is potentially in progress
in progress
Discussion resolved and required actions completed
closed
How to contribute to other people's discussion topics:
Do not add detail to closed or discussed topics as your comments may be overlooked. In this situation, it might be best to Add your details as a new topic and reference the previous topic.
To contribute to an existing topic. Add a new paragraph to the description column.
@mention yourself at the beginning of the paragraph
How to indicate you are also interested in a topic:
@mention yourself in the "Interested parties" column and add your institution name
How are topics archived:
When a topic status is set to closed by it's "Owner". The topic must also be moved to the "Metadata Management implementers Archive" page.
Copy the topic and paste it at the top of the Archived topics page that is nested under this page
Delete the topic from this page
Metadata Management Road Map Dashboard
Metadata Management Bug Tracker
List of Issues with label “metadatamanagement”:
Topic | Status | Description/Use Case | Data Added to this Table | Contact Name | Interested Parties | Link to Meeting Discussion | Link to Jira Issue | Action | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Reorder of Holdings and Items | in progress | We want to be able to reorder the holdings and items in how they are displayed. | 2019-01-01 | @Laura E Daniels | @Laura E Daniels | UIIN-2688: Refine scenarios and verify sorting of items enumeration by numberBlocked MODINVSTOR-1142: Item sorting is not working for some columnsDraft UXPROD-1635: Order/sequencing of holdings on an instance record. Re-order Holdings recordsDraft | SME’s need to vote | |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|