2024-12-05 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Meeting time: 11:30 AM EDT, 05:30 PM CET, 04:30 PM BST

Meeting URL: Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting . The meeting password can be found here.

Date

Dec 5, 2024

Note taker

Laura Daniels, Lynne Fors, Alissa Hafele, Natascha Owens

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on AWS from 2022 onwards: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/

Discussion items

Item	Presenter	Notes

Item	Presenter	Notes
Announcements		Bugfest extended 1 week - ends tomorrow and many unclaimed tests still.
Results from subject granularity and date sort/filter UAT	@Christine Schultz-Richert @Ryan Taylor	@Christine Schultz-Richert could you share your slides here? 19 participates and no showstopper issues! Date sort excited but confusion around functionality. Some UI changes needed to be functionality more clear. suggested enhancements - resize, change delimiter, change to way info appears in descriptive data accordion. Next step: UI/UX change discussion Subject Granularity well received some reports of issue with display of subject source - mapping rules confusion around local config for 2nd ind. 7 suggest enhancements - change to display of $2 info when settings unavailable. No Jira yet but looking into getting work done.





PC updates	@Charlotte Whitt	2024-12-05 Product Council Agenda & Meeting Notes Announcements: LOC is now on FOLIO also on Acquisition and soon also to go live with ERM. Update on subgroup’s eval of PC Functionality Review process: @Jennifer Eustis's presentation. Currently the PC has a decision log, but we are not tracking the process. Currently lack in clarity and no well understood process on when and why to submit review to PC. The working group has therefor consulted the much more structured TC Request Review process. A similar process provide a structure. The PC working group will work further on the purpose with this. The working group has presented the proposal to the Product Owners, and gotten feed back. @Caitlyn Stewart underscored that right now the burden is on POs to present for the PC. The PC is proposing to play an more active role and the PC to be more pro-active. The PC can help coordinate, and make sure the limited resources are spend well. @Kristin Martin: What is important is that the PC Review process is mutual beneficial - for the PC, for the POs/Development team. PC Goals ranking results and next steps: @Caitlin Stewart's presentation.
BELA (Bulk Edit and Lists App)	Jennifer Eustis	No meeting. Focused on Bug Fest.
Data Import Working Group	Jennifer Eustis	No meeting. Focused on Bug Fest.

Chat

08:30:27 From Alissa Hafele to Everyone:
I’m here and can take notes
08:30:33 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
Reacted to "I’m here and can tak..." with 👍
08:38:09 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
Having date available as metadata element that we can a) see in the result list and b) filter on is really great.
08:38:25 From Sheila Torres-Blank (she,her) to Everyone:
Reacted to "Having date availabl..." with ➕
08:38:40 From Magda Gad to Everyone:
Reacted to "Having date availabl..." with ➕
08:44:20 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Would $2 fast be added as a source folio?
08:44:34 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Replying to "Would $2 fast be add..."

as opposed to adding it locally

08:44:55 From Amanda Scott to Everyone:
Reacted to "as opposed to adding..." with ➕
08:45:22 From Christine Schultz-Richert (EBSCO) to Everyone:
Reacted to "Having date availabl..." with 💚
08:45:39 From Ryan Taylor to Everyone:
Replying to "Would $2 fast be add..."

Today it would need to be added locally.