/
2022-02-08 Acquisitions Meeting notes

2022-02-08 Acquisitions Meeting notes

Feb 11, 2022

Date

Feb 8, 2022

Attendees

Agenda

  • Housekeeping -

    • reminder please respond to the poll regarding changing Friday meetings schedule if you haven't done so already

    Business -

    • Summary of MODFISTO-283 discussed last Friday

    • Data sync questions re: the acceptable delay for data to be in sync across apps @Martina Schildt   

      UXPROD-3342 - Implement data consistency approach for Piece<>Item interaction IN REFINEMENT

    • Discuss the display of Item status in receiving - https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIREC-214

    • Highlights of the Lotus release

    • If time permits, discuss Implementer's Topics #23 (carried over from last Friday’s meeting)  see Implementers topic list link here - Acquisitions/Resource Management implementers

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

  • Results from the poll do not show a problem with switching the Friday meeting time. 

  • Need to check with the ERM Sig, many of them also attend the Friday meeting. 

  • We are not meeting this Friday. 

  • For now, will schedule for next Friday, will update the group when (if) a change is made. 

 12:09

 Summary of MODFISTO-283 discussed last Friday

 Dennis

  •  Calculation of over encumbrance is not being reported properly.

  • Working on it

12:13

Data sync questions re: the acceptable delay for data to be in sync across apps @Martina Schildt   

UXPROD-3342 - Implement data consistency approach for Piece<>Item interaction IN REFINEMENT

Martina Schildt

12:47

Discuss the display of Item status in receiving - https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIREC-214

Dennis

  • Dennis: Needs clarification in the receiving area. Item status here is retrieved. If there is an item with a status of available, it will show as available But there is some logic that states if the item status is order closed or on order, we display an item status of 'in process',  Logic from the past was that when you click receive, you are going to put the item status into the status in process.  This is causing confusion. 

  • Question: Should we just display the current item status?

  • From Lisa G Smith to Everyone 12:50 PM Yes, please display only the current item status!

  • From Bill Verner to Everyone 12:51 PM Yes, I agree with Lisa. I can see literally no reason not to display the current status.

  • From Julie Stauffer to Everyone 12:53 PM Does that mean that the item status can be updated at the point of receiving?

  • From Ann-Marie Breaux to Everyone 12:54 PM we had that previously, Julie, but we ended up changing to hard-coded. If the item has On order, then change to In process. If nay other status, don't change the status.

  • From Julie Stauffer to Everyone 12:54 PM I'm ok with that, it's just strange to talk about changing that into one or more columns, etc

  • From Kristin Martin to Everyone 12:55 PM How can you check out an item that hasn't been received?

  • From Ann-Marie Breaux to Everyone 12:55 PM
    Dennis, if we show the current status, could we add a sentence in the UI that indicates any open order will be changed to In process when received.

  • From Dennis Bridges to Everyone 12:56 PM
    Yes we could definitely add a note here

  • From Dung-Lan Chen to Everyone 12:56 PM
    If an item received has a request attached to it, a message pops up to indicate that when receiving it.

  • Ann-Marie will make an video

Action items