Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
| "EDIFCT order export UAT" "EDIFACT order export UAT" | DennisDennis | - "EDIFACT order export UAT" part 1 has started"EDIFACT order export UAT" part 1 has started
- There were some problems this mornin, but it has all be fixe.Â
- Posted the form ltl bit ago. If you want to participate, click the for and follow the instructions.Â
- Y
- There were some problems this morning, but it has all been fixed.Â
- Posted the form a little bit ago. If you want to participate, click the form and follow the instructions.Â
- Y
|
| | Ann-Marie | - Are there any library's that have POL's with ultipl lcaions/funds that will b endingediact ders?
- Silence frome group.Â
- From La Smith to Everyone 12:09 PM
MSU does have some orders withsplit funds; it's possible we would send via edifact.
- Place of publiction: We will leave out.Â
- Material type: On the POL, material type is not always filled in. If you are not creatin an itm, this is't require.Â
- If no mterial types specified in he ordr, it will be oitted.Â
- If multiple formats listed, (print plus online material) what should we do?
- Could repeat the field?
- Dennis: Give the vendor as much information as possible. Sending a material type of multi isn't useful other then they'd have to ask for more information.Â
- nn-Marie: Will repeat the field, and put the separate material types in different fields.Â
- When ordering P/E mix, there is a quantity of 1 for physial and 1 for online. Devs were asking if in he order export should t be 2?
- Ann-Marie: In my mind, n. It should be 1.Â
- Sara Colglazier: Agree, We are payig for 1 order,that we get dfferen things with.Â
- Ann-Mari: Can the quantity of physical and electronic ever be different?
- Fro Peter Sbrzeny to Everyone 12:24 PM We would not do that.
- From Masayo Uchiyama to Everyone 12:24 PM We would not do this either.
- From Lisa Smith to Everyone 12:25 PM I agree with quantity 1 (1 p/e item)
- From Peter Sbrzesny to Everyone 12:25 PM +1 for quantity 1
- Ann Marie, can quantity be associated with material type if material type is used? Â
- Ann-Marie: I am 65% sure they are not associated with each other, I will double check.Â
- Ann-Marie: So the rule will be: We will not sum the numbers. If the quantities are not equal, take the higher number. If strange numbers, will likely have a note for the vendor.Â
- Dennis: Someday will be able to have a 0 for quantity.Â
- From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone 12:26 PM +1 looking forward to being able to have a 0 for Quantity
- Note to vendor question:Â
- his is not currentl in the outut. Do libraries feel like theris a need to have this at the po level or just at the pol level.Â
- Never mind: Folio onl has the note to vendor at the pol level. So will leave it there for order exports.Â
- Ann-Marie: Need to take into accnt: the field whee he fund code is output, n edifact for thi is RFF plus b fn field. What we're intending to do is if you're using a find an expense class, we are out putting both of those separated by a colon. But that is tricy;we're going to have to do something with t output to make su that it's being treated as kind of a break between fund and expense class versus the normal meaning that is in effect for the colon
- Ann-Marie:Another note: Currently there i not a fild forthe VendorReference number, bu yumy have one becaue there i a title number from the vendor. Need to have a spot to put it when exportn the order.Â
- Dug-Lan:Mono hist expense clss is moreimportant than the fnd. Folio output both. Chck with vendoon whether they could only pull the expense clss from the fu.Â
- FromPeter Sbrzesny to Everyone 12:37 PM We definitely need fund plus expense class for each order.
- From Lisa Smith to Everyone 12:38 PM Can we edifact fund only, if we are using expense classes?
- Dennis: We would need some kind of configuration. Within one file, we should be able to configure that. Dennis will look into that. Â
- Libraries: If questions about fundexpense class handling, check with your vendor(s).Â
- Sara Colglazier: What about when you have an approval plan and the records automate a load.Â
- Ann-Marie: I think you'll be fine.Â
- From Julie Brannon (sheher)Everyone 12:54 PM Did I hear Ann-Marie report that importing order in MARC format is at risk for slipping from Morning Glory (and alrady sippd from Lotus)? Â It has onsistenlybeen rnkedhighly through the pointing exercise etc. Â How can we avocate strongly for this?
UXPROD-185
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Ann-Marie: Yes, it is at risk.Â
- From Kristin Martin to Everyone 12:55 PM We have certainly advocated for it!Â
- Kristin: We do have a work arond.Â
- Ann-Marie: Draft plans for Morning Glory arue th end of JanuaryÂ
|
| | Ann-Marie | - Are there any library's that have POL's with multiple locations/funds that will be sending edifact orders?
- Silence from the group.Â
- From Lisa Smith to Everyone 12:09 PM
MSU does have some orders with split funds; it's possible we would send via edifact.
- Place of publication: We will leave out.Â
- Material type: On the POL, material type is not always filled in. If you are not creating an item, this isn't required.Â
- If no material type is specified in the order, it will be omitted.Â
- If multiple formats listed, (print plus online material) what should we do?
- Could repeat the field?
- Dennis: Give the vendor as much information as possible. Sending a material type of multi isn't useful other then they'd have to ask for more information.Â
- Ann-Marie: Will repeat the field, and put the separate material types in different fields.Â
- When ordering P/E mix, there is a quantity of 1 for physical and 1 for online. Devs were asking if in the order export should it be 2?
- Ann-Marie: In my mind, no. It should be 1.Â
- Sara Colglazier: Agree, We are paying for 1 order, that we get different things with.Â
- Ann-Marie: Can the quantity of physical and electronic ever be different?
- From Peter Sbrzesny to Everyone 12:24 PM We would not do that.
- From Masayo Uchiyama to Everyone 12:24 PM We would not do this either.
- From Lisa Smith to Everyone 12:25 PM I agree with quantity 1 (1 p/e item)
- From Peter Sbrzesny to Everyone 12:25 PM +1 for quantity 1
- From Dung-Lan Chen to Everyone 12:21 PM Ann Marie, can quantity be associated with material type if material type is used? Â
- Ann-Marie: I am 65% sure they are not associated with each other, I will double check.Â
- Ann-Marie: So the rule will be: We will not sum the numbers. If the quantities are not equal, take the higher number. If strange numbers, will likely have a note for the vendor.Â
- Dennis: Someday will be able to have a 0 for quantity.Â
- From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone 12:26 PM +1 looking forward to being able to have a 0 for Quantity
- Note to vendor question:Â
- This is not currently in the output. Do libraries feel like there is a need to have this at the po level or just at the pol level.Â
- Never mind: Folio only has the note to vendor at the pol level. So will leave it there for order exports.Â
- Ann-Marie: Need to take into account: the field where the fund code is output, an edifact for this is RFF plus b fn field. What we're intending to do is if you're using a find an expense class, we are out putting both of those separated by a colon. But that is tricky; we're going to have to do something with the output to make sure that it's being treated as kind of a break between fund and expense class versus the normal meaning that is in effect for the colon.
- Ann-Marie: Another note: Currently there is not a field for the Vendor Reference number, but you may have one because there is a title number from the vendor. Need to have a spot to put it when exporting the order.Â
- Dung-Lan: Mono hist expense class is more important than the fund. Folio outputs both. Check with vendor on whether they could only pull the expense class from the fund.Â
- From Peter Sbrzesny to Everyone 12:37 PM We definitely need fund plus expense class for each order.
- From Lisa Smith to Everyone 12:38 PM Can we edifact fund only, if we are using expense classes?
- Dennis: We would need some kind of configuration. Within one file, we should be able to configure that. Dennis will look into that. Â
- Libraries: If questions about fund/expense class handling, check with your vendor(s).Â
- Sara Colglazier: What about when you have an approval plan and the records automate a load.Â
- Ann-Marie: I think you'll be fine.Â
- From Julie Brannon (she/her) to Everyone 12:54 PM Did I hear Ann-Marie report that importing orders in MARC format is at risk for slipping from Morning Glory (and already slipped from Lotus)? Â It has consistently been ranked highly through the pointing exercise etc. Â How can we advocate strongly for this?
UXPROD-185
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Ann-Marie: Yes, it is at risk.Â
- From Kristin Martin to Everyone 12:55 PM We have certainly advocated for it!Â
- Kristin: We do have a work around.Â
- Ann-Marie: Draft plans for Morning Glory are due at the end of January.Â
|
|
|
|
|