2019-01-10 Metadata Management Meeting notes
Date
Recording of meeting: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gDoeZN8PmDJ0FZ_oJas-FxfOFnYfup4O
Attendees
please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|
Additional notetaker? | Lisa needs to leave at the hour. If we run later, can someone volunteer to pick up the notetaking? Charlotte & Laura will | |
Product Council Update | A discussion about implementation guidelines continued. Some schools will begin with a partial implementation. Some full implementations are still planned for 2020. As far as Dracine knows, Chalmers is still planning on implementing in 2019. | |
Subgroup Updates |
| |
Codex | VBar | Vince Bareau will join us to talk about the Codex https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1eFYbHQ2IkFUakE39OJ9UfNBeKizQH0uxHfYkEmpnSCg/edit?usp=sharing ______________________________ Slides Definition:
Questions arose about what the search results in the Codex would look like. Chicago made the point that bibliographic information is so closely related to acquisitions information. Vince pointed out that identifiers between Chat: Question (Five Colleges): When you order a resource, one use case is to export a bib record from OCLC. If acquisitions is separate from the inventory domain, how would this work? And how would that bib record linked to the order record be stored? Answer: Take exported MARC record from OCLC, create an order that would link back to the source record. That info would not go into Inventory until the item is actually held. Question (Sara): What in Codex will show that a second copy is on order? Answer: Items on order are handled by acquisitions. When no longer on order, a receiving process will bring that into Inventory. The responsibility shifts to Inventory. Inventory will report then to Codex. Codex results set will show both : owned from Inventory and on order by Acquisitions. Question (Ann-Marie): An e-resource could be held in Inventory and KB, how does Codex show that? Answer: It will show one line fed by Inventory another line fed KB to the Codex. Discovery will sit on top of Codex. Jason - Why would we want this paired down data to be the information in discovery layer? Felix – are there performance/reliability concerns around sending every request through Codex? Charlotte – suggestion for Linked Data working group that includes MM, Codex, RM At what stage does something move from Acquisitions to Inventory? Can this be flexible/customizable? – ideally, yes Use cases for ongoing orders, e.g. a serial or standing order? this is configuration, not dependent on Codex Codex could be the place where all authorities are managed. Jacquie: how would Codex link to external authorities/identifiers? Codex as way of sharing info cross-tenant Is it a single Codex or multiple Codexes (across libraries)? – one Codex within each FOLIO system What type of data storage is being envisioned in Codex? -relationships -authorities This would be a huge change. Will need to go through Technical Council. |
present? | Name | Organization |
---|---|---|
Alice Krim | ||
x | Ann-Marie Breaux | |
Ann Kardos | UMass Amherst | |
x | Charlotte Whitt | Index Data |
X | Christie Thomas | |
Colin Van Alstine | Smith (FC) | |
Damian Biagi | ||
x | Dennis Christman | Duke University |
x | Dracine Hodges | Duke University |
x | ||
Filip Jakobsen | ||
x | Jacquie Samples | Duke University |
x | Jason Kovari | |
Jennifer Eustis | UMass Amherst | |
Jessica Janecki | Duke University | |
x | Laura Wright | |
Lisa Furubotten | Texas A&M | |
x | Lisa McColl | Lehigh University |
Lisa Sjögren | ||
Lynn Whittenberger | ||
x | Mary Alexander | Univ. of Alabama |
X | Natascha Owens | |
Niels Erik Nielsen | ||
Patty Wanninger | ||
Sarah Schmidt | Duke University | |
Tiziana Possemato | ||
x | Jenn Colt | |
x | ||
x | Martina Schildt | VZG |
x | Sara Colglazier | MHC/5C |
Nancy Lorimer | Stanford | |
x | Aaron Trehub | Auburn |