2021-05-24 Resource Access Meeting Notes
Date
Attendees
(Sorry, forgot to write them down...)
Note taker = julie.bickle
according to Zoom logins:
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info/notes |
---|---|---|---|
40 mins | Title Level Requests Presentation of mock-ups and discussion | Stephanie Buck | _ Slide 4: Title look-up is a new feature, I think (building a modal [pop-up window] for it). Item look-up doesn't exist either yet. Title look-up could function similarly to patron look-up. _ What if you untick the box afterwards - or is it impossible? Hmmm-- either you couldn't uncheck it OR have item level filtered back into the view. Probably ok before you save to untick; afterwards, you prob. can't switch back to item. _ New idea= create a request from a new instance. _ Keep them seperate? (Instead of having a check box) New request --> Item or title? General consensus on the work flow --> Steph can now work on user stories >> estimate effort >> more nitty-gritty of how this will work in the back end.
_ Will the student understand this jargon? So does the UI help the operator make the right choice? We want the least training possible, and this looks like you need insider knowledge. |
15 mins | Title Level Requests Presentation of mock-ups and discussion | _ Reordering would use exsiting drag&drop functionality (which already exists for item level) _ How does the system prioritise item vs. title level request? I don't think we've made a decision yet, prob. first in first out. ==> Could someone please work on a work-flow for prioritisation? Marie / Thomas / Erin → Don't hesitate to use Slack to post your thoughts too! |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Reasoning | Link to supporting materials | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
| e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue | |