2021-09-23 Resource Access Meeting Notes

2021-09-23 Resource Access Meeting Notes





Date

Sep 23, 2021



Zoom

https://zoom.us/j/337279319 (pw: folio-lsp)

Attendees

@Sharon Wiles-Young

@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee

@Thomas Trutt

@Amelia Sutton

@Monica Arnold

@Andy Horbal

@Dwayne Swigert

@Kimie Kester

@Martina Tumulla

@Schwill, Carsten

@Erin Weller

@Andrea Loigman

@Cornelia Awenius

@Laurence Mini

@David Bottorff

@Mark Canney

@Elizabeth Chenette

@Brooks Travis

@Thomas Paige

@Jana Freytag





Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info/notes

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info/notes

2min

Administrivia

@Jana Freytag

National Holidays:
US

  • Monday, October 11 – Columbus Day

  • Thursday, November 11 – Veterans Day

  • Thursday, November 25 – Thanksgiving Day

Germany

  • Monday, November 1 - All Saints' Day

  • Notetaker: @Andy Horbal



Captions

Chat

30 min



@Brooks Travis

enhancement of Check-in and Check-out that might help address the duplicate barcode issue



Meeting Notes

Enhancement of Check-in and Check-out that might help address the duplicate barcode issue - Brooks Travis

Hotfix 2 in Juniper was originally supposed to include a fix for an issue with duplicate barcodes (e.g. multiple items at a single institution have the exact same barcode) whereby FOLIO won’t let you save them. This is now scheduled for Kiwi. It will create a need for institution-specific suffix for such items, which would affect Check in, Check out, and Requests app as well as INN-Reach. Brooks is proposing a fuzzy truncated wildcard match for barcode search to support this. It could be counter-productive to other efforts to simplify/speed up such functions, but would be extremely helpful for institutions with large numbers of duplicate barcodes (such as 5 Colleges, who has ~200,000). Sierra does this. A pop-up will appear instructing users to pick which barcode they want.

Use cases include consortia and ILL contexts where institutions are using the barcodes applied by the item’s home institution, which could duplicate barcodes used by borrowing institutions.

Since this is a tenant-level solution, no one on the SIG has any objections to Brooks’ s proposed solution, especially if the developer time comes from INN-Reach! Institutions that aren’t likely to be affected to this expressed an interest in hearing from those that do implement this about any impact on response times.

SIG members expressed additional thoughts about who should pay for development such as this which primarily affects individual vendors.

Next steps: Brooks will write this up as a feature and bring it back to the SIG for further discussion.