2021-04-29 Resource Access Meeting Notes
- Jana Freytag
- Mark Canney
Owned by Jana Freytag
Date
Attendees
@Catherine Descanzo
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2min | Administrivia | Upcoming National Holidays Some EU-States: Thur 13th and Mon 24th of May USA: Mon, 31st May -- These Dates will be cancelled |
| |
| 20Min | Batched fee/fine notices | UXPROD-2252 - Getting issue details... STATUS - the ability to send batched fee/fine notices | ||
| 10Min | Pointing Process | all | General discussion and special pointing for RA topics? |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Reasoning | Link to supporting materials | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
| e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue | |
Notes:
- Meeting dates will be cancelled due to national holidays: May 13, 24, 31
- Sharon, PC updates. IRIS release will be on time. Hotfixes planned (5/28, 6/28) for data import.
- Elastic search, forming a working group to investigate contact Laura @cornell. SMEs needed ... one to two hours per week.
- Darcy. Batched fee/fine notices, JIRA UXPROD-2252. serveral charges on a single notice. most commonly in aged to lost (lost item processing and item fee, would send out on two seperate notices).
- Scheduling: overnight batching and/or periodic scripted batching. Would it make more sense to have ability to add custom batch times? There is a feature for that.
- Linked spreadsheet is a comprehensive summary of multiples on all types of notices with their priority as determined by the RA SIG.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I8i1IUbuDz9XgBgSZ8xXmFymIQ9_R-Gc63I8RndEWiI/edit?usp=sharing - would it make more sense to have ability to add custom batch times? feature for that.
- Is there a token in the f/f notice for total owed? total for the things on the notice or overall statement of patron total? There is a feature for total owed.
- Please consider voting for set cost features on pointing process
- Request queue prioritization. Currently is fifo. Also, we can manually reorder queue. Is there a reason to prioritize automated request queue prioritization - in the system? Doesn't seem like a priority.