2021-04-19 Resource Access Meeting Notes

2021-04-19 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Apr 19, 2021

Attendees

@Maryam Vardeh

@julie.bickle

Robert Scheier

@Beth

@Cornelia Awenius

@Andrea Loigman

@Darcy Branchini

@kristin.olofsson

@David Bottorff

@Rebecca Pernell

@Joanne Leary

@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee

@Kelly Drake

@Thomas Trutt

@Marie Widigson

@Erin Weller

@Andy Horbal

@Christine Tobias

@Martina Tumulla

@Mark Canney

@Brooks Travis

@Cheryl Malmborg

@Kimie Kester

@Laurence Mini

@Molly Driscoll

@lisa perchermeier

@Jana Freytag

 

 

 

Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info

2min

Administrivia

@Jana Freytag

Welcome to all the new members. Please take a minute to look at this page and add your info here: Resource Access SIG

Onboarding document for new SIG Members

  • Notetaker: @Jana Freytag

30Min

Title Level Requests

@Kelly Drake

Feedback on proposed UI, and process for managing title level requests

 

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/fines

Name

e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019

Clearly stated decision

  • Because...

  • Because...

e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

  1. Introduction round - new SIG members and all others

  2. TLR - new UI developments since last week

    1. The title info was added

    2. The requester should be associated with TLR

    3. Request statuses were added

    4. Suggestion in Chat (Erin): 'It almost feels like there should be a TLR app'  - this was dismissed because that would be a too complex structure

    5. If there is an item level request and a TLR that predates it, it should be a higher priority

    6. Brooks: TLR and ILR should be in a unified request queue (with options to reorder, edit,..)

    7. A look at other systems like Voyager and Koha were taken in consideration

    8. Material type: At what level is the material type included in the invoice?

      1. The material type will be considered in the circ rules/loan policy

    9. Andrea: How does the system handle multi volumes?

    10. We need a way of indicating what type (loan, material) allows TLR and ILR

      1. It was thought not to be a good idea to indicate this in the loan type/Circ rule because it is all about the item level there

    11. Suggestion in Chat (Bob): Why not turn TLR into ILR that picks up the next available? - This was dismissed, because it was already decided, that a TLR is needed

    12. Outcome: Kelly and Kimie will bring this back to us in 14 days and in the meantime will meet with Brooks and discuss this further