2020-10-22 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Attendees

Andrea Loigman

Joanne Leary

Michelle Suranofsky

Monica Arnold

Mark Canney

Joshua Lambert

Laurence Mini

Emma Boettcher

Kimie Kester

Rameka Barnes

Cheryl Malmborg

Darcy Branchini

David Bottorff

tpaige@umass.edu

Jana Freytag


Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals/Info
2minAdministrivia
  • Holiday (Jana) next week
  • Daylight saving time in Europe this Saturday
20Minitem states - Lost item application and the using of statistical codes Talk about the Lost Item application and the possibility using of statistical categories
20MinClaimed returned reportapproval of wireframe for claimed returned search

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue
LoansEmma Boettcher
Show effective location on CR report; allow users to filter by effective location & primary service point for that location
Add more information about locations in export, but revisit that in the group
Limit # of searches by the primary service point for the effective location
























Notes

  1. Administrativa:
    1. we switch our Thursdays meeting time to the full hour again (10:00/11:00/17:00)
    2. Jana will send out new invitations with the correct time table for next week (daylight saving time in Europe)
    3. Next weeks Thursday meeting will be cancelled
  2. Lost item Application
    1. Lehigh was given a grand by EBSCO for developing this application
    2. more item statuses were needed and Emma suggested statistical categories
    3. feedback about statistical codes:
      1. David B.: likes this approach (lost item> newly purchased item > lost item stays in the original status)
      2. Andrea: would duplicating a status
      3. Michelle: there will be a status code that defines the item as beeing a lost item
      4. button: purchase/request>
      5. Process status could be fitting (process status will be costume statuses)
      6. difference between statistical codes (repeatable) and process status (automatically changed by a certain process)
  3. Claimed returned report
    1. we looked at the mock ups and csv report
    2. In the Report (UI)
      1. Options: Add search, Declared lost, mark as missing, User details, fee/fine details, item details, loan details
    3. We wanted to be able to filter by location, what location do we want?:
      1. Group: effective location would be prefferable on the UI
      2. Which part should be exported?
        1. Joanne: permanent location, temporary location, effective location
      3. Marc C.: Print a pick slip would be a helpful feature vs. the csv export (similar to the request app)
    4. Service Points
      1. limit the number of searches based on location, service point
      2. by which attribut is the limit of searches set
        1. Location, Service Point, Effective Location
        2. setting it by Tenant is to general