2020-06-11 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Jun 11, 2020

Attendees

@Andrea Loigman
@Brooks Travis
@Cheryl Malmborg
@Jana Freytag
@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee
@Cornelia Awenius
@Joanne Leary
@Maura Byrne
@Elizabeth Chenette
@Mark Canney
@Cynthia Lange
@Kimie Kester
@David Bottorff
@Allison Estell
@Darcy Branchini
@Brian Arrigo
@Donna Minor
@Chris Dunham
@mey
@patty.wanninger
@tpaige@umass.edu

Discussion Items

Time	Item	Who	Description	Goals/Info

Time	Item	Who	Description	Goals/Info
2min	Administrivia	@Andrea Loigman		Notetaker - @Jana Freytag / @Mark Canney
15min	Implementation News	@Brooks Travis and @Anya	Update from MSU
30min	Users	@Maura Byrne and @patty.wanninger	User fields and RA needs	Updated user fields list

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area	Product Owner	Planned Release (if known)	Decision Reached	Reasoning	Link to supporting materials	Comments

Functional Area	Product Owner	Planned Release (if known)	Decision Reached	Reasoning	Link to supporting materials
e.g. loans, fees/fines	Name	e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019	Clearly stated decision	Because... Because...	e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue

Notes

Implementation News:
1. MSU went live on Monday with circulation
2. ran into a few bugs
3. regarding service points and notices - hot fix on the way
4. 101st record will not be loaded
5. migration of active loans via check-out-by-barcode-APIs
6. scheduled notices were created via script
7. fees/fines were not migrated
8. Darcy wonders if, something simliar to the loans notices would be needed for the request notices

2. User Management discussion:

a. Maura Byrne and Patty Wanninger from User Management shared the User Fields spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F2vVsiNJhms7dqZbjSE6mMJ58WT1miBbo254i0QkbUc/edit?pli=1#gid=0

key to color codes:

blue - supplied by system. already present
red - repeatable
green - no jira tickets yet
purple - have jira tickets

b. Patty Wanninger and Erin Nettifee discussed User Management and the issues of custom fields as a token in notices and custom fields in the LDP. There are jiras for these.

c. Preferred pronouns with prominent placement in the user record should be a separate feature to be ranked.

d. Custom fields in the user record with a controlled vocabulary? Yes.