2020-06-11 Resource Access Meeting Notes
- Andrea Loigman
- Mark Canney
- Jana Freytag
Date
Attendees
- Andrea Loigman
- Brooks Travis
- Cheryl Malmborg
- Jana Freytag
- (OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee
- Cornelia Awenius
- Joanne Leary
- Maura Byrne
- Elizabeth Chenette
- Mark Canney
- Cynthia Lange
- Kimie Kester
- David Bottorff
- Allison Estell
- Darcy Branchini
- Brian Arrigo
- Donna Minor
- @Chris Dunham
- mey
- patty.wanninger
- tpaige@umass.edu
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2min | Administrivia | Andrea Loigman |
| |
| 15min | Implementation News | Brooks Travis and Anya | Update from MSU | |
| 30min | Users | User fields and RA needs | Updated user fields list |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Reasoning | Link to supporting materials | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
| e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue | |
Notes
- Implementation News:
- MSU went live on Monday with circulation
- ran into a few bugs
- regarding service points and notices - hot fix on the way
- 101st record will not be loaded
- migration of active loans via check-out-by-barcode-APIs
- scheduled notices were created via script
- fees/fines were not migrated
- Darcy wonders if, something simliar to the loans notices would be needed for the request notices
2. User Management discussion:
a. Maura Byrne and Patty Wanninger from User Management shared the User Fields spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F2vVsiNJhms7dqZbjSE6mMJ58WT1miBbo254i0QkbUc/edit?pli=1#gid=0
key to color codes:
blue - supplied by system. already present
red - repeatable
green - no jira tickets yet
purple - have jira tickets
b. Patty Wanninger and Erin Nettifee discussed User Management and the issues of custom fields as a token in notices and custom fields in the LDP. There are jiras for these.
c. Preferred pronouns with prominent placement in the user record should be a separate feature to be ranked.
d. Custom fields in the user record with a controlled vocabulary? Yes.