2020-06-25 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Attendees


Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals/Info
2minAdministrivia Andrea Loigman
40minCirculation logEmma Boettcher

Solicit feedback on circulation log wireframe, highest priority aspects

  • Wireframes (with user & item selected, with just user, and with just item)


Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue














Notes 

Emma Boettcher Showed wireframe for circulation activity action log.

  • Should we show the person who performed the action in the log display?
    • Andrea: Yes.
    • Carsten's email to the RA SIG mailing list: Yes, maybe, with restrictions on who can view, particularly around fees/fines
    • Jana concurs
    • Emma's takeaway: potentially make including operator data on an action in the log configurable by action or action type
  • Andrea: Service column?
    • Emma: Service Point, where applicable
  • Emma: How to get here?
    • Andrea: User record (pre-populate search), inventory item record, directly
  • Cate: What about requests activity history?
    • Emma: How granular to filter?
    • Andrea: Columns sortable?
    • Emma: Maybe?
  • Andrea: What filter check boxes are selected by default? How does modifying filters affect the number of paged results displayed?
    • Emma: Should show full number of results based on new criteria
  • Jana: How are proxy relationship actions displayed in the log?
    • Andrea: Include indicator for proxy transaction in the log and link to detail view?
    • Emma's takeaway: Don't need proxy user info in the table.
  • Emma: item information to display?
    • Barcodes (patron/user, as well?)
    • Blank user barcodes for anonymized loans
    • Andrea: How do you get to the details?
      • Emma: Ellipsis actions menu on each row
    • Cate: requests details?
      • Emma: Yes, just not in this mock-up
    • Andrea: How to handle non-applicable detail links?
      • Greyed-out vs. Invisible
        • General consensus around greyed-out.
  • Include patron blocks?
    • Override handling
      • Search on description vs. separate actions for override transactions
        • Separate actions preferred, but can live with keyword search
  • Thin-thread on permissions: separate permissions for access to log (Brooks and Andrea)
  • Andrea: Any places there shouldn't be a link to this?
    • None indicated.