2020-10-26 Resource Access Meeting Notes

2020-10-26 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

Oct 26, 2020

Attendees

  • @Andrea Loigman

  • @Brooks Travis

  • @patty.wanninger

  • @Emma Boettcher

  • @Cheryl Malmborg

  • @Andy Horbal

  • @Anya

  • @Elizabeth Chenette

  • @Cornelia Awenius

  • @Darcy Branchini

  • @Holly Mistlebauer

  • @Kimie Kester

  • @Mark Canney

  • @Molly Driscoll

  • @mey

  • @Joanne Leary

 

 

Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info

Time

Item

Who

Description

Goals/Info

2min

Administrivia

@Andrea Loigman

  • Thursday will be cancelled due to a low on topics this week

  • Notetaker - @Brooks Travis

15Min

Field Restrictions in User Management

@patty.wanninger

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-206

Khalilah closed it as "won't do" back when she was UM PO but it keeps coming up. We could easily do this if we were willing to have a UI-only permission restriction, but we have been reluctant to do that for security reasons. Do we want to reconsider? What if we made the fact that the data is only restricted in the UI explicit in the permission name? 

UXPROD-242: Ability to Protect Fields from Being Overwritten by User ImportDraft

  • Cannot restrict contact information access because it is part of the User main schema

  • Discussed ability to protect fields from being overwritten by User Import

    • Cornell and Chicago are using custom loaders/middleware

    • Pre-processing records not really a viable option for everyone (significant barrier to adoption)

10Min

Claimed returned: add search

@Emma Boettcher

Limit number of searches: by service point, location, "owner"?

Discussion not needed. Covered at previous meeting.

15Min

Item statuses

@Emma Boettcher

Confirm circ behavior for new statuses

 

Circulation Behavior for Proposed new item statuses:

  • Long Missing

    • Check-in: allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Check-out: allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Requests: allow none

  • In Process (not requestable)

    • Check-in: Allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Check-out: Allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Requests: allow none

  • Unavailable

    • Check-in: Allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Check-out: Allow, require confirmation, notify if suppressed

    • Requests: allow none

  • "Dummy"

    • Check-in: Prevent

    • Check-out: Prevent

    • Requests: allow none

Discussion around CDL/ETAS

  • Subgroup meeting to discuss on Thursday (10/29) during normal RA SIG meeting time

15-20Min

Fees/fines export spreadsheet

@Holly Mistlebauer

Approval of thin-thread spreadsheet

Discussed re-arranging columns such that fee/fine action items come before fee/fine detail to avoid confusion.

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to supporting materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/fines

Name

e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019

Clearly stated decision

  • Because...

  • Because...

e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue

 

 

@Emma Boettcher

Iris

Warn but ultimately allow circulation of long missing or in process (not requestable) items; prevent circulation of dummy items. Prevent requests for all three

Consistent with previously agreed-on behavior

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes