2020-04-30 Metadata Management Meeting notes

2020-04-30 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Date

Apr 30, 2020

Attendees

please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7G8S7WF6N20YUM4My1oRTIxSHM

Discussion items

Product Council Update

@Former user (Deleted)

The Product Council meeting was cancelled. Dracine did announce that there is a new Sprint Review (84-85) that can be viewed.

Subgroup & other updates?

 

  • MM Reports - Group work is going well.

  • Charlotte - UXPROD-137 (transfer holdings and items) - An EBSCO developer team to work on this has been identified. Stephanie Buck will be the Product Owner of this group.

 

Planning

@Laura E Daniels

  • CQL and, Postman hands-on sessions? - Common Query Language used for searching and Postman for mapping MARC to Instance.

    • Charlotte volunteered to lead a session on CQL. She suggested having a session in a couple of weeks. Laura suggested that we could use the MM time slot.

  • Magda will ask Andy Rogers to demo Postman.

  • Another tips/tricks edit-a-thon? - Thoughts to have a shorter time 

  • Boundwith topic for a meeting? Group would like to see in FOLIO - Charlotte thought we could look at data in different environments. If you would like to demo what you do not and/or what you plan to do in FOLIO, let Laura know.

  • Digital Bookplates are used at the 5 colleges. Donor manager app. in FOLIO is not developed. Martina will check at the RM meeting tomorrow. Future meeting? UXPROD-1018: Ability to manage Donor information within FOLIOClosed

How to approach feature review

Feature ranking/gap analysis redux

 

Begin discussion

features:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IoGBR4uWXCTDeag5tlMf0fRD0BFDb8r84IOgS0ZUUUE/edit?usp=sharing

ranking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g8pCNmg2DrGJzUAtQHXPas8M9WIDXijnY4q666teeDc/edit#gid=0

 

Cornell recently reviewed features they ranked "go-live" and quarter after go-live. Considered whether workarounds previously considered are still viable. Would it be helpful for us collectively to look at features important to us? Where are there commonalities that we need to advocate for? Some may have workarounds that others are not aware of. See Laura's docs above.

 

Action: How can we effectively address features and prioritization? How can we look collectively at what has not yet been developed and what is most important?

 

Future MM meetings (ongoing)

 

Add ideas here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit

 

present?

Name

Organization

present?

Name

Organization

x

Aaron Trehub

Auburn

 

Ann-Marie Breaux

EBSCO

 

Ann Kardos

UMass Amherst

x

@Charlotte Whitt

Index Data

 

Christie Thomas

Chicago

     x

Christin Seegert

hbz

 

Colin Van Alstine

Smith (FC)

 

Damian Biagi

 

 

Dennis Bridges

Stacks

x

Dennis Christman

Duke University

     

Douglas Chorpita

Goethe Uni Frankfurt

x

Dracine Hodges

Duke University

regrets

Felix Hemme

ZBW

 

Filip Jakobsen

 

x

Jacquie Samples

Duke University

 

Jason Kovari

Cornell

 

Jenn Colt

Cornell

 

Jennifer Eustis

UMass Amherst

 

Jessica Janecki

Duke University

 

Kristen Wilson

Index Data

x

Laura Wright

Cornell

 

Lisa Furubotten

Texas A&M

 

Lisa McColl

Lehigh University

 

Lisa Sjögren

Chalmers

 

Lynn Whittenberger

 

x

Magda Zacharska

EBSCO

x

Martina Schildt

VZG

 

Nancy Lorimer

Stanford

 

Natascha Owens

Chicago

 

Niels Erik Nielsen

 

 

Patty Wanninger

EBSCO

x

Rita Albrecht

HeBIS-Verbundzentrale

 

Sara Colglazier

MHC/5C

 

Tiziana Possemato

 

 

Theodor Tolstoy

EBSCO

 

Wayne Schneider

Index Data