2020-04-30 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Owned by Laura E Daniels
Last updated: May 07, 2020
2 min read

Date

please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7G8S7WF6N20YUM4My1oRTIxSHM

Discussion items

Product Council UpdateFormer user (Deleted)

The Product Council meeting was cancelled. Dracine did announce that there is a new Sprint Review (84-85) that can be viewed.

Subgroup & other updates?
  • MM Reports - Group work is going well.
  • Charlotte - UXPROD-137 (transfer holdings and items) - An EBSCO developer team to work on this has been identified. Stephanie Buck will be the Product Owner of this group.


PlanningLaura E Daniels
  • CQL and, Postman hands-on sessions? - Common Query Language used for searching and Postman for mapping MARC to Instance.
    • Charlotte volunteered to lead a session on CQL. She suggested having a session in a couple of weeks. Laura suggested that we could use the MM time slot.
  • Magda will ask Andy Rogers to demo Postman.
  • Another tips/tricks edit-a-thon? - Thoughts to have a shorter time 
  • Boundwith topic for a meeting? Group would like to see in FOLIO - Charlotte thought we could look at data in different environments. If you would like to demo what you do not and/or what you plan to do in FOLIO, let Laura know.
  • Digital Bookplates are used at the 5 colleges. Donor manager app. in FOLIO is not developed. Martina will check at the RM meeting tomorrow. Future meeting?  UXPROD-1018 - Getting issue details... STATUS

How to approach feature review

Feature ranking/gap analysis redux

Begin discussion

features:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IoGBR4uWXCTDeag5tlMf0fRD0BFDb8r84IOgS0ZUUUE/edit?usp=sharing

ranking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g8pCNmg2DrGJzUAtQHXPas8M9WIDXijnY4q666teeDc/edit#gid=0


Cornell recently reviewed features they ranked "go-live" and quarter after go-live. Considered whether workarounds previously considered are still viable. Would it be helpful for us collectively to look at features important to us? Where are there commonalities that we need to advocate for? Some may have workarounds that others are not aware of. See Laura's docs above.


Action: How can we effectively address features and prioritization? How can we look collectively at what has not yet been developed and what is most important?


Future MM meetings (ongoing)

Add ideas here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit


present?

Name

Organization

xAaron TrehubAuburn

Ann-Marie BreauxEBSCO

Ann KardosUMass Amherst

x

Charlotte WhittIndex Data

Christie ThomasChicago
     xChristin Seegerthbz

Colin Van AlstineSmith (FC)

Damian Biagi

Dennis BridgesStacks
xDennis ChristmanDuke University
     Douglas ChorpitaGoethe Uni Frankfurt
xDracine HodgesDuke University
regrets

Felix Hemme

ZBW

Filip Jakobsen
xJacquie SamplesDuke University

Jason KovariCornell

Jenn ColtCornell

Jennifer EustisUMass Amherst

Jessica JaneckiDuke University

Kristen WilsonIndex Data
xLaura WrightCornell

Lisa FurubottenTexas A&M

Lisa McCollLehigh University

Lisa SjögrenChalmers

Lynn Whittenberger
xMagda ZacharskaEBSCO
xMartina Schildt

VZG


Nancy Lorimer

Stanford


Natascha OwensChicago

Niels Erik Nielsen

Patty WanningerEBSCO
xRita AlbrechtHeBIS-Verbundzentrale

Sara ColglazierMHC/5C

Tiziana Possemato

Theodor Tolstoy

EBSCO


Wayne Schneider

Index Data