2017-09-27 - Consortia SIG Notes

2017-09-27 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

Sep 27, 2017

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Tania Hewes

  • @Michael Winkler

  • @Martina Tumulla

  • @Paula Sullenger

  • @Peter Murray

  • @Marc Keepper

  • @Kirstin Kemner-Heek

  • @VBar

Goals

  • Continue to develop consortial needs matrix

Discussion items

 

 

 

 

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping

  • membership list on wiki

  • calendar invites

David, all

 

5min

Takeaways from meeting with PC

David, all

Recruiting other consortia

  • is it in the interest of the project to cast a wide net at this point in time?

    • seems worth doing if only for raising profile; @Peter Murray can send a message to ICOLC, @David Dahl will craft

  • PALS might be someone to reach out to; @Michael Winkler will reach out to them

10min

Montreal Tech Meeting recap

Peter, others

Nothing specifically related to consortia; there was some discussion about locations structure; next step is mock-ups and sketches of screens to see if this still makes sense and will work for us.

30min

Review and add to consortial needs matrix

All

Questions/impressions

  • Some things are close but not exactly the same; is it okay to add this? yes, column added to reflect related/duplicate items; another possibility - add comments in individual consortia's column

  • is there prioritization implied?

    • absolutely necessary vs. nice to have

    • suggestion: this should be an iterative process

      • make a complete list

      • refine needs

      • prioritize

  • are these current or ideal requirements

  • seems to represent use cases for consortia

  • other possibilities that should be included (desired)

    • shared facilities

    • shared collection management

  • add high-level categories

10min

Wrap-up/planning

All

Next week - Continue to add to consortial needs matrix - both specific needs and high-level categories

Future topic

  • after the matrix is fleshed out, how do we share what we've done?

Did we add consortial extensions to all tabs in the requirements document yet?

  • No. We needed to take a step back and look at consortia at a higher level to make sure we understood the consortial models that we want supported in FOLIO. The needs matrix should help identify those. Review of the v1 requirements will be picked up after this is complete (if needed). If a particular requirement requires urgent review/discussion, we can address it specifically.

Action items

@David Dahl will craft a message for ICOLC list
@Peter Murray will add dynamic membership list to SIG home page
All - review and add to consortial needs matrix - both 'needs' and 'categories' tab