2017-08-30 - Consortia SIG Notes

2017-08-30 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

Aug 30, 2017

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Paula Sullenger

  • @Tania Hewes

  • @Martina Tumulla

  • @Charlotte Whitt

Goals

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping

  • SIG membership list on Wiki

  • David out week of 9/20; need convener

  • @David Dahl will start a members list on wiki

  • @Paula Sullenger will convene the 9/20 meeting

45min

Consortial scenarios review

 

#3 is more of a library-specific situation rather than a consortia scenario

  • "two-layer" library system

    • administratively separate - own funding and materials

    • does hierarchy affect other functional areas - permissions, acquisitions, etc.

#1

  • similar scenario in FLO

    • difference: each institutiion owns their own material

      • Texas has a similar situation between a state and private institution; @Paula Sullenger will look into details of this

  • should/can library layer be shared by multiple institutions/campuses? both this scenario and #2 would benefit from that

#2

  • separate ILS - not quite a consortia

Important point: System needs to be able to adapt to changing relationships between libraries. Moving any layer of the hierarchy to a different spot would ideally be a "drag-and-drop" function (e.g. Library A moves from Institution 1 to Institution 2).

Any other scenarios?

  • none come to mind

10min

wrap-up / planning

 

Next week

  • begin review/discussion of Resource management v1 requirements

Action items

@David Dahl will confirm with RA SIG that 4-level hierarchy seems like it will work
@Martina Tumulla will develop scenario #3