Date

30 Aug 2017

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping

SIG membership list on Wiki
David out week of 9/20; need convener

David Dahl will start a members list on wiki
Paula Sullenger will convene the 9/20 meeting

45min

Consortial scenarios review

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Un1PhPEB2iMdCkiRfTbBOOYwUz3kBPZ5En5HasqIUGA/edit

#3 is more of a library-specific situation rather than a consortia scenario

"two-layer" library system
- administratively separate - own funding and materials
- does hierarchy affect other functional areas - permissions, acquisitions, etc.

#1

similar scenario in FLO
- difference: each institutiion owns their own material
  - Texas has a similar situation between a state and private institution; Paula Sullenger will look into details of this
should/can library layer be shared by multiple institutions/campuses? both this scenario and #2 would benefit from that

#2

separate ILS - not quite a consortia

Important point: System needs to be able to adapt to changing relationships between libraries. Moving any layer of the hierarchy to a different spot would ideally be a "drag-and-drop" function (e.g. Library A moves from Institution 1 to Institution 2).

Any other scenarios?

none come to mind

10min

wrap-up / planning

Next week

begin review/discussion of Resource management v1 requirements

Action items

David Dahl will confirm with RA SIG that 4-level hierarchy seems like it will work
Martina Tumulla will develop scenario #3

Browser not supported