2017-07-26 - Consortia SIG Notes

2017-07-26 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

Jul 26, 2017

==> Be sure to use this new meeting link: https://zoom.us/j/816262954 <==

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Christopher Holly

  • @Hkaplanian

  • @Martina Tumulla

  • @Michael Winkler

  • @Charlotte Whitt

  • @Paula Sullenger

  • @Peter Murray

  • @Kirstin Kemner-Heek

Goals

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping

 

  • David will be out the week of 8/5. David will send an email to the list for a volunteer to convene the 8/9 meeting; looks like a few other people will be out as well.

  • Meeting link has been updated; calendar invites, SIG pages, etc. have been updated to reflect this

  • Peter has proposed a method for displaying SIG membership dynamically: https://discuss.folio.org/t/adding-sig-membership-to-wiki-user-profile-and-dynamically-generating-sig-member-lists/1039. Members can go ahead and indicate membership in their profile. There are a few outstanding questions before Peter adds this to SIG workspaces.

40min

Locations, collections, and consortia (oh my!)

 

  • probably doesn't have much impact on #1. gets more interesting starting with #2. utilize software to create boundaries where needed; could be particularly useful for fund management

  • consortial relationships don't always align with funding sources

  • how are seven reasons for consortia existence impacted by model? do we need use cases for consortial services?

  • need to send location information as part of API

    • example: approval plans

    • ordering of item isn't necessarily tied to location/owning library; is important for shelf-ready, though

  • what controls ability to create tenants? none at this point, but it is planned and being worked on

  • use case: mini-research collaborations that need a library system

10min

Wrap-up/Future meeting planning

 

what do we do with these discussions?

  • Harry will meet with Vince and Cate about model

Need to run through models with developers and get their feedback

Consortial extensions column

  • continue with this work in upcoming weeks now that we have had some more discussion about locations and consortia

  • @Hkaplanian will look at these

Action items

@Hkaplanian will review consortial extensions that have been added to RA requirements so far