2017-09-06 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

06 Sep 2017

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

Time	Item	Notes
5min	Housekeeping	Product Council conference presentations (ER&L suggested) possible topics consortia models/architecture attendees are looking for presentations with concrete ideas that they can take back; at this point, we don't feel we have anything that meets this criteria RM requirements Harry: everything currently above the line will stay; some items from below may move up
40min	Consortia models single shared tenant vs. one library per tenant models - there were questions about the "shared tenant" model at the UM SIG meeting last week 2017-03-31 Meeting notes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Goq8UVwZu_LfkpqRSle4p654Xy5jLsbpV0VFk84uPO4/edit?usp=sharing	Current tenancy model multiple but independent libraries within system consortia functionality would require external software Shared system one catalog/patrons for all libraries how does a library participate in multiple consortia in this model? might be a distinction between a "consortium" and a "system of libraries" TAMU example do we need to better define consortia and related terms "one-track" and "two-track" two-track - organizationally independent one-track - shared organization/staff "library union" = shared system acquisitions funds - sensitive and can't be shared between libraries hbz - funds are at institutional level rather than consortial level
10min	v1 requirements review - planning/next steps	deferred
5min	Wrap-up	Next steps for next meeting, define "consortia" and "shared/union" - what situations are appropriate for each? it would be good to have a solid draft for the PC meeting on the 14th David Dahl will put together a first draft by noon on Friday; comments/adjustments from all by end of day Monday; discuss at next week's SIG meeting (9/13) future meeting item: review RA extensions - are we covering both "consortia" and "shared" use cases?

Action items

David Dahl - draft definitions for "consortia" and "shared" models