2024-02-02 Acquisitions Meeting notes - POLs with un receivable items

Date

Attendees

  • Aaron Neslin

    Kimberly Pamplin

    Nina Stellmann

    Alissa Hafele

    Kimberly Wiljanen

    Okay Okonkwo

    Catherine Tuohy

    Kristin Martin

    Owen Stephens

    Dennis Bridges

    Linh Chang

    Peter Breternitz

    Dung-Lan Chen

    Lisa Maybury

    Sara Colglazier

    Dwayne Swigert

    Lisa Smith

    Susanne Gill

    Heather McMillan

    Lucinda Williams

    Sven Thomsen

    Jackie Magagnosc

    Martina Karlsson

    Sylvia Hamann

    Joe Reimers

    Martina Schildt

    Timothy Nelson

    Julie Stauffer

    Mary Moran

    Victoria Anderson

    Kathleen Norton

    Nancy Pelis

    Winter White

Agenda

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
  • Housekeeping -

    • Dennis & Joe have conflict with Thunderjet team sprint planning meeting that they can only attend the first 30 mins
    • Next meeting - Tuesday, Nov. 6, at 1 pm Eastern
    • Reminder - if you have any item/topic you'd like to suggest for Acquisitions SIG meeting agenda, please feel free to reach out via Slack or bring up in our meetings
 :03
 Joe

UAT for location restricted funds will run Monday - Friday next week. 

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/x/NBxU
  • There are not permissions assigned. 
  • It's ensuring that the funds and locations line up. For instance, if you have a fund for rare books, you can link it to the locations of rare books without having to configure a bunch of acquisition units and permissions. 


:06
Dennis

Review options of handling POLs with un receivable items 

  • Conversation related to a question brought up in slack.
  • Adjusting po line status
  • We are not certain how you might expect this to behave. 
  • Dennis showed an example of a one time order, orders with a workflow of synchronized, which is usually a one time. 
  • Order has multiple copies. One is received, one is un receivable. We had been using a receipt status of fully received and closed. Is this acceptable? Or is there a better way to do it. 
  • Concern - how you pay may be effected by the receipt status of 'fully received' if you think both had been received and pay for both even though only one was received. 
  • Julie: If something isn't coming and we are never going to get it, does it affect commitments against funds associated with the POL?
    • Dennis: no
    • Kristin: when the po is closed, funds are released. 
  • scolglaz 8:14 AM
    This can also important for what you see in Inventory!
  • Julie: Needing to know why something has happened is important. Is ok with status of partially received or incomplete status but not fully received. 
  • Owen: Agrees. Trying to figure out why things don't balance out it is important to be able to see a status that indicates partially received. 
  • Kristin: If I see a partially or incomplete po with a closed status, it's something I'd end up investigating. Would rather be able to update the order to reflect what we were able to get. 
  • Sara points out that if you change the quantity to two and it adjusts the price that works out in some scenarios. In others, if you have a 5 volume set, and only four are published but the price stays the same, you don't want the price to be adjusted. 
  • Have a synchronized order for a certain quantity and mark one of those pieces as un receivable and pay full price. It is in fact, fully received. 
  • Lisa Smith, Mich State 8:33 AM
    I think using 'unreceivable' for ongoing orders only is the way I'd go.  for one-time orders, updating the POL is in line with what we've been doing.
  • Will continue conversation.


:36
Kristin

PC Update

Action items

  •