| * | Java 17 RFC | |
Notes: - Do we need subgroup, or just go on to public review phase?
- Craig McNally We don't have much of a middle ground between TC discussion vs. RFC, except AD. Should capture decision in the log. Do we have to loop in others?
- Jeremy Huff How would we apply to existing modules?
- Maccabee Levine Let's just to the RFC process "swiftly". Get to public review immediately.
- Craig McNally Useful exercise to see how that works?
- Jeremy Huff We already had lazy consensus on Preliminary Review on Wednesday. Public Review does need time for input.
- Craig McNally We've rarely/never? done the "Post Review" process of helping us improve the process.
- Jeremy Huff Grace period needed? Subgroup maybe needed to hammer out those details. Better for culture of project.
- Julian Ladisch Backend modules are separate, so individual modules could still work as J11. Teams can share any difficulties during Public Review.
- Craig McNally Give it maybe a week?
- Consensus yes, one week. Keep to our own deadline.
- Jeremy Huff will lead subgroup and get it wrapped up quickly. Julian Ladisch and Craig McNally participating.
- Team will add comments to the PR. Jeremy Huff will also set up a chat.
- Deliverables:
- Work with the submitter of the Java 17 RFC to refine and provide feedback.
|