| | | |
|---|
1 min | Scribe | All | Jakub Skoczen, followed by <??>
|
10 minutes max | TCR Board Review | All | nothing new |
5 min | CC / PC Updates | Maccabee Levine / Tod Olson
| Marc Johnson PC is having discussions about Data Import that might have an impact on the TC work
Craig McNally shared some background for these: perceived problems reported by various institutions may coincide with work led by Taras Spashchenkoto address DI issues
Ingolf Kuss: during the last TC meeting it was mentioned that TC should only accept TCRs approved/originating from the PC (to be discussed later)
Jenn Colt: post on the internal Slack mentioned changes planned for the DI module, things like Kafka configuration may be relevant for the TC architectural review Tod Olson: specific documents capturing DI issues reported by various libraries (specifically ARLEF) mentioned in the PC meeting notes 2023-06-01 Product Council Meeting notes
|
1 min | Elections | All | |
1 min | WOLFcon planning | Maccabee Levine
| |
5-10 min | Technical Council Sub Groups Updates | All | Hosting costs: no updates Breaking changes: no updates, meeting planned for next week Improvements to the TCR process: Java 17: RFC is out but working group will look into it Dist vs centralized config: Craig McNally the deprecation statement in mod-configuration will be updated to reflect the fact that mod-settings is an alternative but recommends storing sensitive information within the module
Expect a statement regarding deprecation Gathering various links for the subgroup to review Slack channel: #tc-distributed-vs-centralized-config
Architectural review: no updates, postponed
|
5 min | Upcoming meetings | Craig McNally
| |
5-10 min | RFCs | All | Kafka RFC: Olamide Kolawole comments from Julian, TC is asked to review the comments by Monday for a special meeting
Tod Olson question if the Kafka security should be in scope for the RFC
|
5-10 min | Possible Budget Surplus | Maccabee Levine
| |
5-10 min | Officially Supported Technologies - Upkeep | All | |
5-10 min | Browser support | All | |
time permitting | Terminology Document | All | Craig McNally the term "platform" is something that we wanted to revisit but the terminology document otherwise has been accepted by the three councils
Craig McNally what is the urgency on this?
Jenn Colt has been talking with Marc Johnson on Slack and was thinking that could be part of a larger conversation about architecture
Marc Johnson is okay leading this conversation and rolling it into the Architecture discussion, we could use platform as the first topic on the Architecture sub-group
|
Other | | | Craig McNally mentioned that there were concerns about relaxing tenant separation in the consortia module. Should the TC discuss this during a Monday morning meeting?
Ingolf Kuss it should be discussed with the Security group along with the architects of the functionality ( Olamide Kolawole) rather than on the TC
Craig McNally let's schedule it for the following Monday and take it from there, next steps could involve creating a sub-group or involving the security team. Craig will check with the sec team about it.
Marc Johnson suggests that we use the reminder of time to discuss the sec aspect of the RFC but Olamide Kolawole has left
|
|
| | | |