| | | |
|---|
1 min | Scribe | All | @Tod Olson is next, followed by @Ankita Sen |
1 min | TCR Board Review | All |
|
5 min | CC / PC Updates | @Maccabee Levine / @Tod Olson | Any updates from the PC and/or CC? Project Finances @Craig McNally reached out to @Mike Gorrell asking for more information about how funding decisions are made
@Mike Gorrell will join the TC meeting on Mar 1, 2023 to discuss with us.
|
10 min | Technical Council Sub Groups Updates | All | Technical Goals/Objectives: @Craig McNally will add to agenda for today, TC will either vote up/down today, or will take a week to review and vote next meeting. Charter Revisions: topic with TC next week, group nearly ready to wind down. DR Process Improvements: deadline to review is up today. No objections have come up. Migrated DRs are accepted by default and group can close down. |
|
|
|
|
15-20 min | RFCs | All | Updates: Name change to Tenant Collection Kafka Topics, signal moving away form current per-tenant topics to topics for collections of tenants Outcome would allow Kafka admin to continue the current style of per-tenant topics (by having collections of single tenants), or to consolidating multiple tenants into collections.
Conversation: Goal is to advance RFC to public review process Concern about tenant separation being out of scope. Goal of RFC was to reduce the partition count and therefore reduce costs Tenant separation seems to be another large issue and too much scope for this RFC Original per-tenant Kafka messages at least allowed us to keep Temporary Kafka security solution would be rendered obsolete/deprecated by this RFC (though it seems unlikely this will be done any time soon) Does the ALL tenant topic would close the door to the possibility of separating tenant messages? RFC describes an option to combine tenant message, not a requirement Major trade-off is that we are committing in the long term to support two fundamentally different approaches for the foreseeable future, but does keep the door open
RFC is intended to be practical was of addressing pain points, which includes limited development and funding; hurdle is very high to implement enhanced security
Other notes? Inference: providers do not migrate all tenants to new flower releases all at once, and therefore need multiple versions of a module are active at once. This gives a scenario where multiple versions of Inventory will be consuming a message. Response was cut off due to end of meeting To continue in dedicated discussion on Monday
Outcomes: |
5-10 min | DR-000032 - Splitting Database Read/Write Traffics in RMB | All | |
5 min | WOLFcon Volunteers | All | From slack: Mike Gorrell Hello. Another WOLFcon is being planned (tentatively August 22-24 in Chicago), and we want the FOLIO community to be ready. In order to achieve this we need Volunteers to help plan WOLFcon. Please consider chipping in and join the #folio-wolfcon-planning-group
Notes: |
1 min | Charter Revisions | @Craig McNally | |
1 min | Upcoming meetings | @Craig McNally | |
* | Decision Log Review | @Craig McNally /All | Moved to discussion for next week. |
|
20 min | WOLFcon Hot Topics | All | An overview was provided of the "hot topics" at WOLFcon. It seems clear that the TC ought to be involved in these discussions/efforts; what is the best way to participate?
Notes: Deferred |
| Cyber Resilience Act | @Craig McNally /All | From @Craig McNally in #tech-council: This was brought to my attention earlier today... https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/open-source-software-vs-the-cyber-resilience-act/ While it's still just a proposal, I think FOLIO should keep an eye on, and maybe even try to get ahead of in anticipation of this. I will add it to the agenda for next week's meeting. This is a short read that does a decent job of laying it all out. Please take a look prior to next Wednesday. Thanks! Have folks had a chance to read through any of this? What, if anything do we think the TC should do about this? Raise awareness among other councils? Seek legal advice in anticipation of this being passed? Is there anything else we want to do to be more prepared for this in the event it does get passed?
Today: Deferred |
| Ease of Installing FOLIO | All / @Ian Walls | From last week:
Today: |
| Revisiting FOLIO Governance | All / @Ian Walls | Slack discussion: Revisiting FOLIO Governance @Ian Walls - should be best discussed in cross council meeting possibly at WOLFcon. Idea to was bring this up at a high community level not necessarily the Pc or TC. Doesn't need to be on TC agenda next week. Aspects to be discussed at WOLFcon. See also: messages to PC and CC council channels
|
|
|
|
|