there are many SIGs that have implementers pages where Community can add topics, requirements on new functionality, additions to existing functionality, adjustments to existing functionality
the requirements are discussed in the SIG
afterwards the POs create Jira tickets, that get a specific label (e.g. acq-sig-topics)
everyone with a Jira account can then search and filter on these tickets and vote on them via the voting function in Jira (thumps up)
the development team can then pick up the tickets when development time allows
ACQ SIG tests this process until after Quesnelia, then ACQ SIG will review: what did work, what needs adjusting
when the PC will have a feedback discussion as well
if this process “passes the test” then we would like to have other SIGs adopt it if possible
Discussion:
this process and creation of tickets is a ot of work > SIGs might need help when adopting this process
positive feedback on process
maybe need need to re-discuss the role of SIG convener
maybe we need assisstant POs in more SIGs
maybe we need a new role: SMEs that are responsible to create Jira tickets for their SIG
Aaron Neslin would be a good person to get an introduction on that
Roadmap group will be sunsetting. What do we need to do to ensure the Roadmap and prioritization process are kept current?
Add link to roadmap page
Re-view ACQ prioritisationprocess Yesterday
Follow up on training Jira skills
25 min
WOLFCon topic ideas
Overview of WOLFcon 2024
Bring your ideas for what your SIG is planning with WOLFcon!
What would you want to hear from other SIGs?
All
The deadline for the call for proposals will be extended
Workshops are planned for the day before WOLFcon - this pre-conference is called FOLIO Academy
FOLIO Academy is in person only
WOLFcon itself is organised as hybrid meetings
ACQ SIG has gathered areas of interest and asked people to rank these areas
the ones with the highest ranking will be organised as sessions
Acq SIG also have WOLFCon 2024 brainstorming wiki page started where people can suggest topics or indicate if they’d like to present and the presentation topics they are considering, etc.
RA SIG is starting the discussion on proposals today. There will probably be at least one proposal for a General RA SIG Meeting.
Reporting SIG has (so far) five sessions under consideration for submission. One would be a preconference.
ERM SIG is collecting areas of interest as well:
there will definitely be one or two sessions
one on “what works well in ERM apps, what doesn’t” - with hopefully brief presentations by institutions taht can happen in-person or remote
there is a session on Serials planned
Workflow sessions might of interest - this is still in planning
maybe we a joint session on ERM/Dashboard and Workflow would be of interest
or maybe a workflows working meeting..?
PC
introductory on “what is PC” and a roadmap update - e.g. for people who are new to the project
record session and then put recording up on the wiki
talk about different FOLIO roles
In general: we need good technology to enable virtual attendance
virtual attendance is charged to enable a good experience