<5 mins | Introductions | |
|
20 mins | Sprint Cutoff | Release Candidates Code Review -
ERM-434
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Reviewed, pending ERM-644 to merge ahead of QA.
- However, held up in Jenkins. Needs to be re-run by Claudia ({{git commit amend}}). Currently being rejected.
-
ERM-649
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
ERM-644
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Back with Steve for final review hopefully
-
ERM-645
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
QA / UAT
- Items at Risk / Spillover
- Open / Sprint Backlog
-
ERM-427
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
ERM-655
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
ERM-671
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- In Progress
-
ERM-619
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Confirmed as clear to go (no technical or user dependencies)
-
ERM-633
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
UXPROD-2081
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Front end done
- Fields added to domain model
- Import code is wizardry - need Steve's input
- JSON schema provided for the domain model.
- Still need clarity on business rules and data validation rules
-
ERM-652
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Advance notice of breaking changes fro Acquisitions team
- Orders interfaces are changing.
- New support for packages on POL record.
- Cannot merge ahead of time because of snapshot process
- Changes ready to go, but need to be held until Acquisitions are ready to merge later on 22 Jan
- Backend boxes need to be updated locally as of builds on 23 Jan for Orders 9.0
- Not currently planning to do a formal ui-agreements version release.
-
ERM-619
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
| |
15 mins | New Issues | Raised -
ERM-673
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
ERM-672
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
-
ERM-676
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Brought into sprint: -
ERM-675
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
|
|
10 mins | Next Sprint | |
|
<10 mins | AOB | -
ERM-668
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- developer preference is to follow the recipe for making complex queries that is ERM-specific, rather than a generic solution
- so, no reusable component, but the ux pattern should be reusable
- SAS filters are up for review / re-design
- may need to be run against the ERM usergroup, which could delay
- potentially use popup filters, though this has accessibility issues
- need a PO requirements review, then a UI feasibility review
- Lazy loading readiness
- Aditya matukumalli looking at applying this to ui-agreements, based on ui-users work shared by Victor
- Initially looking at agreement view/edit, but potential application (eventually) for areas such as eresources in agreement
- Net benefit is faster loading / performance
| |