2020-06-24 ERM Weekly Delivery Update

2020-06-24 ERM Weekly Delivery Update

Meeting Details

Date

Jun 24, 2020 

Time

09:30am ET, 2:30pm UK, 3:30pm Germany

Location

Video Call in FOLIO Slack: #erm-developers

Goals

Participants

  • @Jag Goraya

  • @Ethan Freestone

  • @Gill Osguthorpe

  • @Peter Böhm

  • @Claudia Malzer

  • @Aditya matukumalli

  • @Owen Stephens

  • @md331 (Deactivated) 

Apologies

  • @steve.osguthorpe

Discussion items

Previously: 2020-05-20 ERM Weekly Delivery Update

Time

Item

Notes

Action Items

Time

Item

Notes

Action Items

<5 mins

Introductions



20 mins

Sprint Cutoff

Release Candidates

Code Review: 

QA / UAT: NA

Bugix: 

Items at Risk / Spillover

Blocked

In Progress

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-510

    • local dev environment problem is fixed

    • to investigate the GSON file. 

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-950

    • basic functionality broadly working

    • secondary calls nearly working

    • some known issues to iron out before ready for code review / QA

    • Some future use cases to consider in terms of component structure

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-954

    • icons to be dealt with in the future

    • other than that, this is probably 

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-953

    • keeping open, as needs to be revisited to allow for explaining data overlap 

    • Some tweaks rather than substantial reworking to improve contextual information for report users

    • Possibly adjustment to existing columns / additional columns 

    • Grouping / merged row presentation notes

      • Sorting would be inappropriate

      • Filtering is viable

      • Vertical centre alignment is not possible (eg, Platform) with the merged rows

      • Columns that don't vary should not be put in between columns that do vary (nested group issue)

      • targeted css is being used in split cells, so could be elaborated for colour coding 

    • Overlap information may change the shape

      • overlap field values from

        • Full - share a PCI

        • Partial - ...

        • None - don't share a title instance

      • needed because  and  may mean different things in different contexts

      • question about where and when the Overlap value is calculated - in backend seems preferable

Sprint Backlog

Needs Elaboration: NA



15 mins

New Issues

Raised

Additional



10 mins

Next Sprint

  • Continue with Comparison work

  • URL customisation 

  • Some UX improvements



<10 mins

AOB

Persisted accordian behaviour

  • is doable

  • similar approach to panes could be taken 

Last regular ERM call with @md331 (Deactivated)

  • much appreciation all round for his support, contribution and commitment on the team.