2018-10-17 - Consortia SIG Notes

2018-10-17 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

Oct 17, 2018

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Noah Brubaker

  • @Hkaplanian

  • @Martina Tumulla

  • @Kristen Wilson

  • @Peter Sbrzesny

  • @Peter Murray

  • @Steve Bischof

  • @Theda Schwing

  • @Steve Walker

Goals

Discussion items






Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping

All

10/24 meeting - Sebastian Hammer will meet with us about Project ReShare

30min

OAI-PMH FOLIO Project overview and discussion 

@Hkaplanian 

OAI-PMH, Project dashboard: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=75&projectKey=MODOAIPMH&view=detail

  • assumed primary use case is for discovery services

  • building the harvesting service, not the OAI harvester (i.e. FOLIO is source of harvested data)

  • benefit: provides a standard that abstracts out ILS for retrieving data

  • Harvesting will happen on mod-marc-storage (as opposed to Inventory module); long term functionality (native data stores vs. inventory harvesting is TBD)

  • Harry is working as product owner, Craig McNally as tech lead

  • JIRA dashboard for the project is available; Harry will send link

  • questions/discussion

    • upper limit to number of harvesting sources (OHIOlink has 53)?

      • no software limit; might be performance/storage issue

      • initial harvest might be more resource-intensive, but subsequent update harvests will be less so

    • anybody relying on OAI-PMH for any consortial services?

      • none known (for ILS at least)

    • union catalog as patron-facing user interface vs. central repository of records that is exposed through a discovery interface

      • harvesting could be either directly to the discovery layer (i.e. patron-facing UI) or to a central repository of records, depending on the goals of the union catalog

    • bi-directional requirements for union catalog data flow

      • this project would enable one direction (local ILS to union catalog) 

10min

Wrap-up/planning

All

follow up on single implementation model, more discussion about multi-tenant model (multi-tenant is very important to a lot of consortia; how do we move this forward?)

Action items