2024-12-19 Product Council Agenda & Meeting Notes

 Date

Dec 19, 2024

 Participants

  • @Alexis Manheim @Charlotte Whitt @Lisa McColl @Alexis Manheim @Caitlin Stewart @Gang Zhou @Tod Olson @Martina Tumulla @Kristin Martin @Kemner-Heek, Kirstin @Brooks Travis @Owen Stephens @Jennifer Eustis @Jennifer Eustis

  • Note taker: @Lisa McColl@Lucy Harrison

 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 min

Announcements

all

Caitlyn announced that the Library of Congress is going live with ERM Acquisitions today

50 min

Jira literacy, info sharing, documentation, training, etc.

@Caitlin Stewart

Goal

Put together some recommendations for next steps to share with POs and SIGs for input.

Objectives

  • Provide support for ticket creation so that SMEs (anyone) can share needs and development projects with the community in a consistent way

  • introduce a process to maintain Jira so that we have a clearer and more current picture of needs and development activity throughout the community

  • establish guidelines and lifecycle process for ticket management in order to improve overall quality of tickets (improve reporting, navigation, communication, reduce duplicative effort)

  • Clarify roles and responsibilities - clear documentation of permissions, who to reach out to for support, etc.

Assumptions

  • Improving comfort level with Jira is a dependency for rolling out SIG prioritization

    • Impacts:

      • Conveners

      • POs

      • Some groups do not have assistant POs, so SMEs may need to create tickets in certain situations

  • Tickets need to be created earlier in the process

  • Permission

    • Who should have which permission sets

      • sometimes Jennifer creates a ticket but a PO has to clean it up

  • Need clarification re Where do you create the ticket?

  • How do we address cleanup / maintenance

  • Backlog - how do we manage the backlog

  • What is the process for assigning?

    • Could we allow SMEs to create tickets but then assign to PO for completion / vetting

  • How does this intersect with Support SIG - should they be responsible for Jira oversight? Should these be separate pipelines or combined

    • using project language

  • PC needs a way to monitor community needs and ideas so that they can 1) track and guide 2) reflect back priorities

  • Users need to articulate their needs in a way that they can be acted upon

  • POs need to control for noise in UXPROD

    • separate project

      • implementers create tickets in a distinct space > SIG discusses > PO creates UXPROD > periodic review (dashboards?) to ensure nothing languishes

      • “won’t do” tickets could live here with a different status

    • control with status or labels

      • labelling has been inconsistent

    • Do create Jira tickets before PO creates - SIGs refine ideas / needs in spreadsheet

    • need to distinguish the difference between backlog and day-to-day work management

  • In some groups, tickets are SME created, but are vetted by working group

  • Need a way to ensure tickets do not get lost / ignored

  • Need a way to control for quality before tickets are introduced to a project

What is Needed

  • Review what is working

    • Reach out to SIGs for success stories of how they are managing roles and responsibilities, dashboards etc wrt Jira

  • Recommendations

    • Path 1: introduce a process for SMEs to create tickets in UXPROD to capture gaps/ ideas

    • Path 2: Create a separate project for SME created tickets in UXPROD

  • Regardless of path, we have some shared needs:

    • Process documentation

      • Roles and responsibilities

      • Flow

      • Guidelines - POs are working on this, can PC provide input?

    • Jira training

      • Creating tickets

      • creating filters + dashboards

      • searching / navigating

    • Documentation

      • Ticket elements (required elements, templates, data dictionaries)

      • Data dictionary for labels

      • Maintenance processes / housecleaning

      • Process for identifying duplicates

      • Naming convention

Questions

If we assume some SMEs need to create tickets, then we need to determine how to integrate these SME created tickets into the larger

  • What is the underlying concern here - is there a different way to control for it?

  • if there is a separate project, need process to review SME-created tickets, clear on ramp to UXPROD

  •  

Next Steps

 

Resources


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sACkckUJjl4

 

5 min

Future Topics

 

 

 Action items

 Decisions