2020-08-20 Resource Management Meeting Notes
Date
Attendees
- Molly Driscoll
- Virginia Martin
- Jesse Lambertson
- Monica Arnold
- Dennis Bridges
- Tracy L Patton
- Dwayne Swigert
- Tim Whisenant
- Sarah Dennis
- Martina Schildt
- Abigail Wickes
- Ann Crowley
- Julie Brannon (old account)
- Lisa Maybury
- Nancy Pelis
- Owen Stephens
- Sara Colglazier
- Janet Ewing
- Kirstin Kemner-Heek
Goals
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|
Minute taker? | ||
Announcements/Updates Product Council meeting minutes, 8/19/2020
| Product Council is forming a vision and strategy subgroup. See link to minutes at left for more detail. In-depth zoom retreats planned. Kirstin Kemner-Heek is leading the group and shared the list of participants. Virginia had a question about feature ranking as mentioned in the notes of the PC meeting. Kristin explained that for new features, the ranking categories (go-live, can wait one year, etc) are tricky for institutions that are already live. They would like to harmonize the rankings with the bug priority rankings. No re-ranking required, but there would be a one to one mapping. Still under discussion, want to avoid ranking fatigue. Other Announcements:
| |
Expense classes demo and call for feedback | Dennis shared a demo of Shared Allocations and Expense Classes and User Acceptance Testing opportunity. Call for Testers
Virginia - summarized understanding of use case for expense class Sara - I might want my subscriptions to be x amount and print to be y - can we choose something other than %? Dennis: At the moment we're not setting restrictions for the amounts - there is another feature for that. This base functionality tracks, but doesn't control Virginia: What is the advantage of allocating with a large bucket and then allocating percentages by expense class? Ann Crowley - it allows you to analyze what you've spent on each expense class within an entire group - so you can see all electronic spending across a group of funds. Kristin: Depreciation - they have a separate database to track break downs better. Capital expenses are tracked, for examples. Approvals go on a different fund - this might allow all of those to go into one fund. Sara reminded us that Michael Arthur wanted this feature, so he might be able to speak to advantages. Per Ann Crowley, it would be the equivalent of an expense class in Voyager. Expense classes will allow you to track for reporting purposes Martina S - You might have a subject fund and have two budgets - one for monographs one for serials. At the end of the year you might find yourself needing to transfer money if you overspend in one. With this expense class design you can avoid Julie B How soon will the ability to restrict spending based on expense class be ready? Dennis: - UXPROD-2409Getting issue details... STATUS - priority ranking is very low now so its not a Q4 feature which is as far as they've been ranked. Martina would like this between one quarter after go live and one year after go live, but that isn't a ranking option. Sara: How do I see the summary of spending across a group? Open the group and it will appear as a new accordion below the list of funds that are associated with that group. Dennis: There is currently no summary at the ledger level for expense class - it's possible, but wasn't originally identified as important. Feel free to add that feedback during testing. Kristin: What is the deadline for testing? Dennis: One week - it's in the form as well. Link to the UAT Form to participate: https://forms.gle/vyNTxraRswFMcq9h9 _____________________________________________________ Are there any topics anyone wants to discuss? Kristin question about invoice totals: We want to be able to input the full amount on an invoice since the encumbrance is not always identical to what the payment ends up being. Dennis - that's why there is a lock total flag on the invoice so you can work backward - not in the Goldenrod release though. When you go to approve the invoice the system will validate that the lines add up correctly. At the moment, whatever amount you input into the lines (you could have invoice level adjustments) shows up at the top of the invoice. The system sets it - you don't have the option to set it yet. Virginia: How are institutions using acquisitions units? Are they useful? Scott - working well for them - occasionally they have an issue and then realize they needed to add a user to a unit, but otherwise they are working well for their needs. Sara - Filtering: in orders the acq unit is a filter which can be helpful once we have lots of orders. Kristin - at UChicago they're ignoring them but they might consider using them for Law, East Asia, Main but since the budgeting is centralized there isn't a use case for them Virginia - at Duke we have several professional school libraries and we're using the same AP system, but we have 4 administratively separate entities (Law School, Medical Center, Business School, Main). We plan to create an acquisition unit for each of these. Mark Arnold - At Missouri we have a K12 library that can order their own materials, but the main library can also order for them. So if you have people who need access to everything you can add them to all of your acquisitions units. __________________________________________________________________ Discussion of COVID testing at Duke and UChicago News flash: Owen will present the ERM comparison tool at the next sprint review, so that might be worth catching for those who are interested. Watch for recording since the sprint review is an invite-only event. | |
UXQuestions from Adopters/Implementers? |