2020-04-17 Resource Management Meeting Notes
Date
Apr 17, 2020
Attendees
@Kristin Martin
@Scott Perry
@Sharon Markus
@Dennis Bridges
@Michael Arthur
@Martina Schildt
@Martina Tumulla
@Sara Colglazier
@Julie Brannon (old account)
@Virginia Martin
@Monica Arnold
@Tracy L Patton
@Stew MacLehose
Dwayne Swigert
@Scott Stangroom
@Ann Crowley
@jmulvaney@library.umass.edu
@Sabrina Bayer
@Eric Hartnett
@Paul Trumble
@Kathleen Norton
@Former user (Deleted)
@Alice Daugherty
@Heather Thoele
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Minute taker | @Martina Schildt | ||
5 min | Announcements/updates PC Meetings: See previous minutes Some highlights:
| @Kristin Martin /All |
|
45 min | @Sharon Markus @Scott Perry |
| |
40 | Jiras that need SIG review See list in Jira | @Dennis Bridges |
|
Chat
Von Julie Brannon (Duke) an alle: 02:52 PM
Is it possible to add the material type (PO Line element)?
Von Virginia Martin an alle: 02:55 PM
How about reporting on encumbrances?
Von Scott Stangroom an alle: 02:56 PM
similar at UMass (Five colleges) as Duke
Von Sharon Beltaine an alle: 03:00 PM
https://wiki.folio.org/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=36570681&draftShareId=a02014c1-79a7-4ff4-b671-11bd6a2c819b& that's the link to the prototype in case you would like to view it on your screen
Von dbridges an alle: 03:01 PM
This is the number of the feature we are discussing. UXPROD-2362
Von Owen Stephens an alle: 03:13 PM
Agreement Lines are attached to Purchase Order Lines
There is a separate report cluster for reports pulling on Agreement & Agreement Line data, but we’ve discussed the links to this report cluster as there is obv. a big overlap
Von Owen Stephens an alle: 03:19 PM
I think one of the things to remember is that this is about making sure the relevant fields are available to the LDP for reporting. Different implementations and uses of the system could result in different queries and different interpretations of fields in real-world reports
What Scott said :) - if the POL is attached to an Agreement Line you may want to derive the resource description from there, but the resources are described via Inventory, you can go that way instead Or both if you are using a mixture
Von Scott Stangroom an alle: 03:53 PM
The order type would be “gift”
Von Owen Stephens an alle: 03:53 PM
But it’s not an order?
Von Scott Stangroom an alle: 03:54 PM
Not in the traditional sense, but in current systems, including Aleph, this is the way some handle such things
I’m not advocating it - I’d not want to use order records for recording gift receipts
Von Scott Perry an alle: 03:56 PM
Chicago handles this currently via a donor code in the eholding or item which also drives public display.
For gifts, that is
Von Ann-Marie Breaux an alle: 03:59 PM
This is a super-interesting topic to me, but I'm going to need to jump to another mtg