2022-05-18 Meeting notes

To Dos

follow ups 

• Next meetings:

  • 19th May presentation of the gathered feedback/updated proposal and tools to the PC

• Questions: 

  • who will be there?

    • Jana

    • Martina S

    • ...

  • who can give a 5 minute update on the tools demo and feedback of that sessions

  • which will be best for SIG ranking/institutional ranking and why?

  • no live presentation but share comparison sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GYy_BwSkt_D1h5MbWasm4qIJv7tBQNCDPmZYsWygTJ4/edit#gid=0

Notes:

• PC-Presentation:

  • inform the PC on our progress on evaluating possible tools to organize the ranking process better

  • present all the different ways to rank the features

  • Have aSIG Ranking and an institutional Ranking on the same features/same list in an integrated way

  • We have to watch out for features that are not dedicated to one special SIG so these do not go missing

  • One Option could also be to send out a survey once a year to include the hole community

  • weighing needs to be decided: consortias, implemented institutions will have more weight here

  • In addition: a separate product focused survey by the PC to find out general needs or faults of the system (every 6 month)

    • including which functional areas are most important

    • should be one survey per area/SIG

  • Communication on the survey and ranking process should be broad, so that it includes everyone

  • how often is ranking needed or is it an ongoing process?

    • 6 month

  • have the institutions and SIGs rank on different dates/cycles to clearly separate them

  • Give institutions the chance to just step back from the latest ranking (taking the ranking from last cycle)

  • Missing from last pointing process: ranking something not relevant!

  • A ranking R1-R5 vs a prioritised list of all features - combining them could be a way?

PC presentation

• present revised slide deck to PC: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13nt-8deuTQ8Ama1zbLkrOj22fVFXXRVb/edit#slide=id.p6

  • focus on feedback that we got and questions that we clarified

• discuss new ideas today and in PC

  • combine SIG and institutional ranking

  • survey instead of institutional ranking

  • why?

    • request to have rankable chunks → question for POs: how can we reach that?

    • work load vs. amount of influence

• meet with POs

• meet with SIGs

• meet with CC?

• meet at Wolfcon and use that as final deadline for new prioritization start