Would the support issues being part of the process as well?
The wording "the Kiwi pointing process worked well" should be different (see document)
The pointing Process could use more discussions around some features, advocating for them more
End of March would be better
For which release will this next pointing process be (not in 2022?)
Do we need to name a release for this process?
fair, regional, transparent
a clearly described and documented process
Create estimates for features
do we need the pointing process, if we have a good priorization process
better to rank smaller Tickets and not hughe epics, where it is not transparent which tickets are linked to it
giving the ranking process back to the SIGs (a great tool to get people involved in the sigs again)
could be difficult for people attending asynchonous (Time zones, Language gaps)
find a process for SIGs to rank features