| Time | Item | Notes |
|---|
| 20 min | Introduction Clarification of questions Identify a regular meeting slot | - Some libraries are using the prioritazation to create dashboard
- this group will work in addition to the Roadmap group and they will present their progress next week in PC
- can Jira maybe still be used but in a different way to not fall into a "tool overload" by taking on another tool
- Question for the group: whenever we have a proposal, what does this look like
- danger of having too many tags - have to be managable
- regular meeting slots: Meeting will be on Wednesday 09:00 AM EST every other week
- Tod will join us, when possible
|
| 15 min. | Review the charter | - Would the support issues being part of the process as well?
- not in favour for this since these can be bugs
- Bug fixes might have smaller timeline
- The wording "the Kiwi pointing process worked well" should be different (see document)
- The pointing Process could use more discussions around some features, advocating for them more
- End of March would be better
- For which release will this next pointing process be (not in 2022?)
- Do we need to name a release for this process?
- fair, regional, transparent
- a clearly described and documented process
- Create estimates for features
- do we need the pointing process, if we have a good priorization process
- better to rank smaller Tickets and not hughe epics, where it is not transparent which tickets are linked to it
- giving the ranking process back to the SIGs (a great tool to get people involved in the sigs again)
- could be difficult for people attending asynchonous (Time zones, Language gaps)
- find a process for SIGs to rank features
|
| 10 min. | Arrange roles/tasks | - Martina S. and Jana will be convening these meetings
- finding tools
- thinking about further processes
- Anya will ask Anton if there is a possiblity for getting a SIG rank field
- involve SIG Conveners
|