2022-01-26 Meeting notes

Review the charter continuation 

• Check with PC on dead line for this group

• Michelle in Chat: is this group focused on the “how” of prioritization? (what tool to use, how groups give input) or the “what” (individual tickets, modules, themes,)?

  • it is the How will we prioritize, not reviewing individual tickets.

  • my question about “what” was more about, is prioritization supposed to happen at the individual ticket level, or at a broader level? I had heard from a colleague that prioritization might be done at a broader level, like prioritization of epics/themes/modules vs individual tickets. I didn’t know if this group is charged with recommending at “what level” prioritization occurs

  • broader level prioritization

• Decision on Charter

To Dos

follow ups 

• Anya will ask Anton if there is a possiblity for getting a SIG rank field

• involve SIG Conveners → there is a SIG convener meeting planned

  • e.f.: Ranking in confluence on SIG level

  • more news on that, when group met

• check with Holly on feedback to pointing process (MS)

  • If you go to the wiki page FOLIO Feature Prioritization at FOLIO Feature Prioritization, you will see a link named "Planning Process Retrospective".  This is where folks added their comments.

How do other ILS rank? 

III | How do other ILS systems handle prioritization?

• Pros and Cons of NERS:

  • pro: easy to use, good overview of new features

  • con: quiet seldom that features are actually developed; feels unfair

• https://uservoice.com

• The way Voting Systems work in general bring institutions to a point where they group together

• Have the SIG rank in Jira after a discussion

• Miro seams like a good tool to rank in the sigs