2021-12-15 Meeting notes
Date
Attendees
- Raman Auramau, VBar, Zak Burke, James Fuller, Mike Gorrell, Jeremy Huff, Steffen Köhler, Marc Johnson, Craig McNally, Chulin Meng, Tod Olson, Philip Robinson, Owen Stephens, Mark Veksler, Ian Walls
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 min | Scribe | All | Chulin Meng is the next in the list, followed by Tod Olson |
5 min | Review outstanding action items | All | Craig McNally: Created and shared retrospective board to review our process. |
10-15 min | TCR Board Review | All | TCR-9: Should TC review this module? using current criteria? Yes, TC should review it. Scope?: ensure the technical integrity of FOLIO (Jeremy), need to acknowledged we may adjust the criterias along the way. Related: Process for TC to review and provide feedback high-impact changes to FOLIO? Action: Craig/TC will craft a message to PC and developers later. |
5-10 min | New Module Technical Evaluation Previously: "External Code Submissions" | Quick update from the sub-group? No update Quick update from the cross-council group for defining the end-to-end process? No update | |
3 min | Council Goals/Objectives | All | Previous notes:
To review this in the meeting next week. |
5-10 min | Log4shell | All | Placeholder... I'm assuming someone will want to discuss this. If not, we can skip it. Ideally any conversation has a clearly defined goal, and we can time box this.
|
5-10 min | Technical Decision Making Process | This is a carry-over from previous weeks.
Additional Context:
For Today: Any updates on these two things from last week?
| |
5-10 min | Participation and Attendance Expectations | All | Jeremy Huff created a page to track working groups... Should we take a look together and see if anything should be added/adjusted?
Action: we should discuss at next meeting about appointing sub-groups when there are not enough volunteers. |
Time permitting |
|