2021-09-01 Meeting notes

1 min

Scribe

All

@Tod Olson is next in the rotation, followed by @Philip Robinson  if he's absent or uncomfortable with taking notes.

5 min

Review outstanding action items

All

5 min

Improved handling of reference data during upgrades

All

Seeking a volunteer to speak to the MM SIG about this and answer their questions. 

From @Laura E Daniels in #tech-council:

I am mainly interested in making sure MM SMEs understand the proposal in the context of potential ramifications of local mapping decisions (at individual institutions). MM does not plan any work around this, but it might influence some of our documentation.

This also seems like a perfect opportunity for me to ask if anyone here would be interested in joining a future MM meeting to help us understand this PoC (which we were not aware was a Poc)?

@VBar will reach out and offer attend a MM meeting

15 min

External Code Submissions

@Ian Walls

@Zak_Burke

• Update on this effort for this effort? (@Ian Walls)

  • Working group has been working diligently for a week, is close though there are open issues

  • Questions about how we would line up these criteria with our current reality, how we would remediate technical debt in current modules, what languages are we willing to support

  • Questions about need for module to live in github.com/folio-org/ - fends off some potential problems

  • ACTIONS/DECISIONS

    • Is this document, in its current state, good enough for evaluating LDP?

    • Ian has goal of cleaning up document and providing and alternate view with criteria under each value, will share on TC channel

    • TC has until EOB Friday, September 3, for revisions; ratify draft by EOB Friday.

    • The ask is "is this acceptable for an initial version?"

    • Zak and Tod will present progress/plan/draft PC at tomorrow's meeting

• Communication back to PC? (@Zak_Burke)

  • TC external contribution eval plan - statement we can make to the PC about how we are moving forward

  • Currently have a rough list of values and draft of technical criteria

???

Technical Decision Making Process

All

This is a carry-over from two weeks ago week.  It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of

• The tech leads group not being a decision making body

• Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision

  • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.

Time permitting

TC charter review

All