2019-10-09 User Management Meeting notes
Meeting URL
Date
Oct 9, 2019
Attendees
@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee
@Maura Byrne
@patty.wanninger
@Uschi Klute Klute
@Philip Robinson
@Jana Freytag
@Catherine Smith
@Michelle Suranofsky
Nancy Burford
@Wayne Schneider
@Stefanie Sußmann
@Thomas Paige
Goals
Notetaker: ???
Additional fields. While talking about implementing Users, some RA folks said that there were some things, like Statistical fields, that are essential to our functioning. We were going to use custom fields for that, but I was asked whether other libraries needed Statistical fields. If there were enough of us who needed statistical fields, we could advocate for them as additional fields instead of custom fields. The discussion has begun in Jira ticket https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-1295, and I’d like to have some discussion at our meeting. Wayne Schneider from Index Data will be joining us for this part of the meeting, so I’m putting it first.
More JIRAs for this topic: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-1196Statistical fields
Björn (cannot attend today) wrote: Regarding Statistical fields, Leipzig would use Custom fields for that.
Statistical Categories
We had discussed as part of departmental field - ended up deciding for that as a default field with its own Jira
Sense that we would use custom fields for these needs?
External System ID: discuss the mockup: https://issues.folio.org/secure/attachment/21777/NEW%20external%20ID%20to%20UI.png
Patron Notes: We had this on the agenda last week, but we postponed.
Notes, especially regarding tickets for external ID and departmentsFeature request for notes on records being displayed in pop-up or other contexts. (Steffi)
Because this involves the Check in and Check Out apps, this may end up needing to be a feature request for RA to manage.
Last week we had a discussion about whether blocks would function - can we get an information block? Or something on the notes with a flag?
Active/Inactive vs. Expiration date. Patty has updated https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-1255. Patty wants to discuss what we think would be the requirements to get this to work the way we want it to.
Björn wote: Regarding Active/Inactive vs. Expiration date I think Active/Inactive should be able to be set manually at any time and Inactive should also be triggered by Expiration date. An error message that the expiration date must be set (as stated in UIU-1255 screenshots) is not a good option for us.
Erin: Cate Boerema mentions in a comment that she thinks that part of the buggy behavior is because we are trying to allow both things – manually setting it, and having it controlled by the expiration date. She may be getting developer feedback in that, I don’t know.
Because we have decided that an expired account should not be allowed to be active (which makes sense, logically) there needs to be some sort of code that connects the two features.
Cate mentions a use case where FOLIO active / inactive controls the ability to log in. I know that Jana has also mentioned that too many password errors flips a user to inactive as well.So, we have use cases (from this and from https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/display/UM/Active+and+Inactive+Status)
If a user record exists, but they should not be allowed to log in, you would flip the patron to inactive.
Presumably you could also do this by removing all permissions from the record.
This is a manual use case.
If a user tries a bad password too many times, they become inactive.
This is a basic need – if we removed it, it would have to be compensated for somewhere else.
This is an automated use case.
Patron has lost their card, or access to their account needs to be temporarily suspended.
This falls under the category of “temporary suspension of patron privs” as opposed to temporary suspension of operator privs.
This could potentially be handled through user blocks.
This is a manual use case.
FYI: More Wiki pages for Users (by Erin): Users App and Settings - Users and Settings - Circulation - Circulation Rules Editor
If we have additional time:
Multiple Phone numbers https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-254 (Erin)
multiple e-mail addresses - There is no JIRA for this? (Uschi)
More topics from the Open Topics list
Action items from last meetings
(Too strict) Password Rules https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODLOGIN-38
(see also https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/LIBAPP-94 - but these proposals do not appear to have been implemented.)
Notes
...
...
Open Topics
Item | Who | Notes | Discussed Today? | Resolution / Next Steps | Carry topic? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Searching by specific fields | Erin | Right now Users has general keyword searching; we will want to be able to search specific fields - IDs, emails, addresses, notes? Perhaps one of these issues fits: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-1015 https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-907 (New feature) https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-869 (Epic) https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-1941 (new feature) https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-1028(Story)
|
|
| Yes; this is not yet resolved. |
Pop-ups on user transactions | Steffi | notes may be used for communication about users, and pop-ups on user transaction (or displaying of notes) is desired. Khalilah indicated this should be raised as a new feature request. |
|
|
|
Deleting User Records | Erin | Discussing the need for deleting patron records (no Jira currently; need for one discussed in comments of https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIU-1079) |
|
|
|
Password validation | Uschi | refering to Action Item "Create Feature for password rules" This is the story for the validation of passwords: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODLOGIN-38 Some of the rules seem to restrict too much. We would like to configure the password strength. See configuration options in the ILS the GBV libraries use now (at the bottom of this page) |
|
|
|
Custom Fields | Uschi | https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-33 the tag cap-mvp has been removed, but development goes on |
| The tag was removed, and this was dropped from the MVP due to capacity (discussed at RA SIG meeting) We can and probably should review the requirements that Khalilah has generated; they are attached to the master Jira. |
|
Relevant JIRAs we talked about |
|
|
| yes |