| Survey | Everyone | Draft list of questions Add a multi-choice to open-ended questions where applicable Use in ‘Gaps’ section for barriers, 3rd party integrations Too many open-ended questions could require responders to take longer to fill out the survey and decrease the number of participants
Add follow-up to the ILS question inquiring which ILS(s) Gaps could be hard to identify if a library isn’t already on FOLIO Add skip logic to differentiate those who have implemented FOLIO from those considering FOLIO Implement based on the category of a responders : considering migration, migration, implemented Questions to ask based on their category :
‘Would you choose single tenant or multi-tenant (ECS)?’ question might be too hard to answer, even for those familiar with FOLIO Transform into a question that gets at what people think is important when considering a single vs. multi-tenant environment Examples : shared collections, ERM, resource sharing, management of workflows, shared patrons, etc.
Question : What is critical for your implementation/migration to be successful? What about responders who are members of multiple consortia? Do we need to differentiate between buying consortia & library network consortia? SIG section : What would motivate someone to come to the SIG meeting? Or how do people want to engage with the SIG? What is the role of the SIG? Want to gather the perceptions and expectations of the responder of the SIG ‘How can the Consortia SIG better meet or represent your needs?’ implies they know the work we are currently doing ; maybe broaden the question to gather feedback on how/what the SIG does as part of the FOLIO community
Is there a way to gather feedback on potential collaboration with other SIGs? # of libraries in a consortium – leave open, free-text so people can respond on multiple consortia if applicable Use a different word than ‘libraries’? – institutions, agencies, or members instead Whatever wording is selected, we need to define it
After we revise the survey with this feedback, we will need to consider the overall length Survey should be anonymous How do we write the survey so it IS anonymous, not just says it is? Don't want responders to feel they can be easily identified based on responses
Type up parameters of the survey to communicate ahead of distribution Intended audience Anonymous How will responses/results be shared? Aggregated responses only? How do we distribute results? Slack channel, emails, etc.
Post from Zorian in Slack : “I had a thought for a question on the consortial survey: Would it make sense to ask a question along the lines of "Does your consortia participate in shared collection management or acquisitions, particularly of e-resources?" This would indicate interest/need in consortial functionality for acq and ERM” Incorporate this feedback into the type of consortium question and Gaps section
Next steps : Corrie and Noah will take this feedback and rework the survey for another round of review |