2021-09-02 - OA SIG meeting

Meeting time: 8:30 AM (EST) / 1:30 PM (BST) / 2:30 PM (CEST)

Meeting URL: https://openlibraryfoundation.zoom.us/j/82643780981 (Password required)

OA Working Group Wiki: Open Access SIG Home

Google Drive Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HR1JyDkUeRE0kL1eBKcu6uIvcNcnn352?usp=sharing

Slack channel: #open-access-management

Mailing list: folio-rm-oa@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org (Subscribe here selecting 'folio-rm-oa' list)

Housekeeping and major community updates

• Outstanding topics, please add any topics that have not yet been discussed, or those that you feel need more discussion to fully understand the issues
  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BTlDlHhaAX35PAQDpz0VvdiObOC3-b1zD5fPl4pgSLU/edit
• All: Please add yourself to the SIG member list at Open Access SIG Home. This is optional but gives the larger community a sense of involved institutions and SIG expertise.
• FOLIO Sprint Review 120-121 available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpHoWJkTZyE
• Recording from last meeting about basic Acquisition workflow in FOLIO is included in the OA recording folder : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FNm8-vYMPyYvODRgHpKYSzXlsFhaayae

Agenda items

• Homework discussion about workflows and institutional hierarchies, please  complete  in preperation to  the  meeting:
  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QvWjOMur7wvN9xyGfrWcDUumf04bMy9-LLT-EaZ7wcs

Minutes

• Looking at the SLUB workflow diagram
• OS: Is this workflow any different in other institutions?
  • PMC: much more simpler, question on how much to pay based on the mumber of authors; just one fund with requirement on report but not the requirement to track all this information
  • Group: agreement to SLUB's workflow chart
• AO: looking at a status between open and closed, there are a lot of steps
• OS: "In progess" should include the answer of "who is next in charge to do something", external/internal, right?
  • Group: yes, agreement
• Homework document
• AO: need to encumber money for BPC first of all, planned but not approved
  • will be followed up on Acq discussion
• Discussion about workflow/status field
• BM: Status fields often represent a series of steps with a given order, but if we have multiple "tasks" that can be done in parallel, we do not have a particular order + we can not infer from one status that all stepas before have been done
• OS: Needs more thinking and discussion with Gill, maybe thinking more of "tasks" that can be done in parallel
• Discussed examples of institutional hierarchies

Attendees