ERM Sprint 59 Retrospective
Date: Mar 27, 2019
Contributors: @Claudia Malzer, @Felix Hemme, @Gill Osguthorpe, @Jag Goraya, @John Fereira, @Kurt Nordstrom, @Martina Schildt, @Martina Tumulla, @Peter Böhm
1. Review Retro Board (10 mins)
Personal sprint highlights
What worked well
What caused problems
2. Voting (2 mins)
3. Discussion (15 mins)
Topic: Detailed information on issues that made it easy to understand the task
In Sprint 59, ERM-64 subtasks were a good example of what needed to be done to complete a task, that could be picked up by non-lead developers
By comparison, ERM-134 hasn't any info
There is value in getting this documented, but a logistical challenge with making it happen
Are there other ways to ensure the knowledge transfer, that don't take so much time for the lead devs? Good practices to try from other teams that people have worked?