2022-04-14 Meeting notes

Date

14 Apr 2022

Attendees

Discussion items

Time	Item	Who	Notes
5-10 min	Spring RCE vulnerability	All	See https://spring.io/blog/2022/03/31/spring-framework-rce-early-announcement FOLSPRINGB-47 - Getting issue details... STATUS Julian Ladisch is writing a script to check for vulnerable modules A message/update was posted to #sys-ops: https://folio-project.slack.com/archives/C9BBWRCNB/p1648740057373649?thread_ts=1648728230.119219&cid=C9BBWRCNB Julian Ladisch has created a few JIRAs for this – he's still working on this. He also wrote a script to list the affected modules - runs periodically The edge modules are probably the most critical - 3 of them are affected. The related POs are aware. Should these fixes be backported to Kiwi? Prevailing thought is that it should since Kiwi is the latest release and Lotus isn't official yet. Craig McNally will communicate this recommendation to the Capacity Planning group, and possibly Oleksii Petrenko. Additional communication will be made once the path forward is clear. Today: This conversation has started, but Craig McNally needs to provide them with additional information about FOLIO's exposure/risk here. WIll post an update in slack later today or tomorrow.
5 min	Update on FOLIO-3317 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Axel	Axel Dörrer Should be removed from week to week agenda and Axel will monitor for progress and report back MODEUS-139 has been moved to the next sprint Axel Dörrer will discuss the data-import ticket with Ann-Marie B. after Lotus. Today: Axel Dörrer is absent today - deferred until next week.
5-10 min	RMB-902 - Getting issue details... STATUS OKAPI-1081 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Team	Notes from previous weeks: Discussions are ongoing, currently blocked on a decision being made. Document the options on the wiki to facilitate these discussions and the decision making process. Julian Ladisch to take this on. By this group? By the TC? How do we constrain the module names? If so, where/how? Various restrictions: Postgres, Hosting infrastructure (Kubernetes/ECS/etc.) What about the tenantId restrictions? Also part of the above discussion/decision. Today: Deferred again. Check in on 21 Apr 2022
5-10 min	STCLI-190 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Team	Notes from previous weeks: There's a PR that hasn't' moved in a while... What's the status? How do we move this forward? Ryan Berger / John Coburn to help push this along. Was there another PR against stripes-testing? already merged (ui-test:94) Today: Was merged, a problem was reported, leading to this being reverted. Appears to be an environmental problem. The JIRA is now unassigned... it isn't clear who has the ball here. Added a comment to STCLI-190 tagging Khalilah, Ryan, and Zak
10 min	MODAT-68 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Team	Context: The ask is to review this story, and more specifically the comment thread. We can discuss more next week. The goal is twofold: Awareness of what's being proposed Possibly make recommendations to the CP team if we have strong feelings about the direction the project goes with this. Today: With so few people available today, it doesn't make sense to have this conversation at this time. Revisit next week?
5 min	RMB-907 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Team/ Julian Ladisch	The level of exposure is not clear at this point. Julian Ladisch will look into it and get back to us. This information will feed back into conversations with capacity planning group wrt backporting to kiwi/lotus/etc. Indications are that there will not be a Kiwi HF3, so it may be that this only gets into Lotus HF1 and Morning Glory.
*	Review the Kanban board.	Team	How did this conversation go Ryan Berger ? Ryan Berger to bring up the react-hot-loader dependency at stripes architecture - is it possible to move this dependency to a central location? We're not using react-hotloader anymore. A new approach is used now. See stripes-webpack for details. If someone tries to use react-hotloader, it winds up being a no-op and a recommendation is shown to use the new approach. The prevailing thought is to remove this since it doesn't provide any value. At this point there is no security concern here. This is really just a technical debt issue.

Action items

Julian Ladisch to document the options for restricting tenantId and module names on the wiki (Context: RMB-902 - Getting issue details... STATUS / OKAPI-1081 - Getting issue details... STATUS )