| | | |
|---|
5-10 min | Spring RCE vulnerability | All | See https://spring.io/blog/2022/03/31/spring-framework-rce-early-announcement
Today: Discussed with Mark V. Harry K, and Oleksii P. - Aiming for Lotus (HF) and Morning Glory. Still confusion about how many releases need to be supported, LTS, etc. Note that this is a P3, if it were a P1/P2 the decision might have been different.
|
| Official security support policy on releases | | Security team needs How many releases from now has to be supported? (3-4 releases or less?) Priority/Risk will likely factor into this as well. Also a matter of capacity Should be raised to the PC → Axel can bring this with a paper/proposal to the PC - not yet. Probably want to bring this to the TC as well at some point, even if only for awareness. WOLFcon session? Axel will produce a paper that outlines that problem by next weeks meeting. Chris to ask his stakeholders about TAMU needs - not specifically, but has started to have some conversations
|
5 min | Update on FOLIO-3317: Spike - investigate possible file upload vulnerabilityOpenPreview | Axel | @Axel Dörrer Should be removed from week to week agenda and Axel will monitor for progress and report back MODEUS-139 has been moved to the next sprint @Axel Dörrer waiting to hear back from Ann-Marie B. about the data-import ticket ... maybe target Nolana?
Today: |
5-10 min | RMB-902: Reject tenant with invalid characters and possibly sanitizeOpenPreview
OKAPI-1081: Reject invalid tenant idsClosedPreview
| Team | Notes from previous weeks: Discussions are ongoing, currently blocked on a decision being made. Document the options on the wiki to facilitate these discussions and the decision making process. By this group? By the TC? How do we constrain the module names? If so, where/how? What about the tenantId restrictions? Some design choices have been suggested.
Today: |
5-10 min | STCLI-190: Update dependencies (CVE-2021-3807)ClosedPreview
| Team | Notes from previous weeks: There's a PR that hasn't' moved in a while... What's the status? How do we move this forward? Was there another PR against stripes-testing? ui-test:94 Was merged, a problem was reported, leading to this being reverted. Appears to be an environmental problem. The JIRA is now unassigned... it isn't clear who has the ball here. Added a comment to STCLI-190 tagging Khalilah, Ryan, and Zak This PR has been reverted because of issues with the included changes of kopy version. The idea is to exclude the kopy changes by now to move forward with this. Last week:
Today: |
* | Review the Kanban board. | Team | |