2017-08-21 Resource Access Meeting Notes
- Andrea Loigman
- Mark Canney
- Maria Grzeschniok
Date
Attendees
- Mark Canney
- Kimie Kester
- Cheryl Malmborg
- Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
- Holly Mistlebauer
- Deb Lamb
- Charlotte Whitt
- Wendy Wilcox
- Filip Jakobsen
- Maria Grzeschniok
Goals
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Housekeeping | Andrea |
|
| 55 min | Workflow app | Filip | workflows app demo at: https://discuss.folio.org/t/zap-workflows-ux-iteration-3-english/1041/9 |
Notes
Filip joined us to discuss the Workflows UX - iteration 3. He asked us each to answer the nine questions he posed in discuss: https://discuss.folio.org/t/zap-workflows-ux-iteration-3-english/1041.
1. How granular should steps be?
2. How meaningful is it to have logic related steps like if/else and loop?
3. Which triggers would be meaningful for your work as an individual and for your particular group at your institution?
4. Which steps would be meaningful for your work as an individual and for your particular group at your institution?
5. How meaningful is the ability to add scripts you write yourself or get written by e.g. a more technical colleague?
6. How meaningful is the ability to publish workflows for others to download?
7. How meaningful is the ability to publish scripts you write for others to download?
8. What's missing from this prototype?
9. What works well in this prototype?
Each SIG member should watch the video and answer the questions and post their answers to the Discuss today.
Some of the questions are provocative and open-ended, so we should answer them as best we can. Filip does not wish to make broad assumptions about potential use of the system so he needs as many people as possible to weigh in about what it should be able to do and how flexible it needs to be.