|
| Paula Sullenger | - Was last week's discussion a final decision? No, and Capacity Team hasn't been brought in, either
- Slides from last week
- There was agreement that the Moscow system can be discarded
- There was also agreement to pull out FYRO
- It seems odd to not have R4 (FYRO)
- Maybe R4 can mean "nice to have" and R5 is not needed?
- R0 - Showstopper
- R1 - Urgent/Blocker (go-live)
- R2 - High (can wait 1 quarter)
- R3 - Medium (can wait one year)
- R5 - Not Needed
- R4 - can wait until fiscal year roll-over would need to be re-ranked manually
- Q-do we need a different system, why not just use P1-P5 already in JIRA
- For developers, P1 means drop everything and fix this - do we really need R0? After some discussion, it seems we can drop the "R0-showstopper." Discussion showed that showstopper has been defined differently by different institutions anyway
- /wiki/spaces/DQA/pages/2657909, P1-P5 - these seem to align with our needs nicely
- Paula will talk with CapTeam - will this system work for them? What do we do with current rankings (rename or leave alone? There is a batch update in JIRA) - Do they have a preference for naming (use Ps or Rs)? And what to do about FYRO issues?
|