...
Item | Presenter | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Announcements | No announcements | |||||||||
Bulk edit of Instance record notes (FOLIO and MARC) - a follow-up to Bulk edit UAT | Proposed new UI:
High Level Roadmap for Bulk Edit App Feedback/discussion
| |||||||||
PC updates | 2024-08-22 Product Council Agenda and Meeting notes Announcements: Reading Room Access functionality to be presented at a future PC meeting. New calendar functionality. Will test out Google calendar. The PC reviewed the Evaluation Process for New FOLIO Functionality the document was created in 2023, and updated with notes from April 2024. The pilot phase is done, and the document is now official. The document is linked to directly from the main page on wiki.folio.org. The PC’s review is a supportive process, and less a enquiring process. The PC do want to understand new functionality contributed to the FOLIO system. All functionality evaluated by the PC are listed here. What requires review by the PC: New apps, cross app functionality, and new modules which will be accessed using the UI. But there might be a grey zone. If in doubt then come to the PC and present your new work. Early on presentations is valuable for the community, and ensure broader understanding of new work. Following values and criteria will the PC be focusing on: App description, App delivery description, Uniqueness, Dependencies, Testing, End-user Documentation. The PC will talk with the Product Owners on how the PC can better support them. The PC will try to attend the PO’s meeting. The SIG liaisons will present for the respective SIGs. | |||||||||
BELA (Bulk Edit and Lists App) | Jennifer Eustis | See update above. | ||||||||
Data Import Working Group | Jennifer Eustis | No meeting this week. | ||||||||
quickMARC Subgroup update | Raegan Wiechert | No meeting this week |
🧑💻 Chat
08:30:33 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
Raegan 🙌
08:30:53 From Raegan Wiechert to Everyone:
Hello
08:32:37 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Just a reminder for everyone to mute their microphones
08:44:40 From Lisa Furubotten TA&M to Everyone:
Option 2 looks good if one considers that later there we be other types of records [so you have to be able to expand]
08:44:49 From Jennifer Eustis to Everyone:
Reacted to "Option 2 looks good ..." with ➕
08:46:15 From Jenn Colt to Everyone:
Reacted to "Option 2 looks good ..." with ➕
08:46:46 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
I have a concern when naming the options "FOLIO" and "MARC". The source field in the instance is just a string field and there can be instances with other sources as well. To me the difference between the 2 options is, if there is an underlying record in SRS that has to be edited or not. For example, the German library networks are using other source codes than FOLIO and don't have SRS records, but want to be able to use Bulk Edit as well on those records.
08:47:32 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Reacted to "I have a concern whe..." with 💯
08:47:55 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Reacted to "I have a concern whe..." with ➕
08:49:32 From Lisa Furubotten TA&M to Everyone:
Sorry, I was interrupted for a moment
08:54:45 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Instances with srs MARC?
08:54:58 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
then we could have a future pattern for other sources?
08:55:54 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
I like that
08:56:08 From Sara Colglazier to Everyone:
rather than Bibliographic record (source FOLIO), maybe Instance descriptive data (source FOLIO)
08:56:36 From jeanette to Everyone:
It also would be easy to read the two similarly with ending with MARC
08:56:40 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
we might have different sources for non-MARC data, though
08:56:59 From Charlotte Whitt to Everyone:
Reacted to "we might have differ..." with 💯
08:57:52 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
srs is currently only MARC, but I hope it won't always be
08:58:14 From Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library to Everyone:
Reacted to "srs is currently onl..." with 💯
08:58:50 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Maybe the source records available for bulk editing could be configured by tenant as more are added to the FOLIO environment?
08:59:28 From Charlotte Whitt to Everyone:
Reacted to "Maybe the source rec..." with 👍🏻
09:00:42 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Yes
09:00:45 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
Reacted to "Maybe the source rec..." with 👍🏻
09:09:29 From Jenn Colt to Everyone:
The perms look good to me!
09:18:59 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
High Level Roadmap for Bulk Edit: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/BULKEDIT/pages/2524679/High+Level+Roadmap+for+Bulk+Edit+App
09:19:09 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Replying to "High Level Roadmap f..."
Code Block |
---|
for those interested |