DR-000018 - Should build (pom.xml) changes required by new RMB be considered breaking?
- Radhakrishnan Gopalakrishnan
- Jenn Colt
Overrides/Supersedes
This decision was migrated from the Tech Leads Decision Log as part of a consolidation process. The original decision record can be found here.
RFC
N/A
Stakeholders
Jakub Skoczen Adam Dickmeiss Julian Ladisch
Contributors
Approvers
This decision was made by the Tech Leads group prior to the adoption of current decision making processes within the FOLIO project.
Background/Context
The Platform team has been working on restructuring RAML-to-Java generation in RMB to remove the need for dependencies at runtime that should be really be compile-time only. See RMB-785 - Implementation/Testing/Code Review: Convert GenerateRunner into maven plugin CLOSED for details. From the module implementers viewpoint the following changes will be required in pom.xml:
- See RMB readme: https://github.com/folio-org/raml-module-builder#json-schemas-api
- See RMB readme: https://github.com/folio-org/raml-module-builder#client-generator
- See RMB Upgrading notes: https://github.com/folio-org/raml-module-builder/blob/master/doc/upgrading.md#version-330
The Platform team would like your feedback on whether these changes should be considered breaking (RMB v33) or minor (RMB v32.2).
Assumptions
N/A
Constraints
N/A
Rationale
N/A
Decision
Build changes (new RMB Maven plugin) will be released as new major RMB release (v33)
Implications
- Pros
- N/A
- Cons
- N/A
Other Related Resources