| Time | Topic | Lead By | Notes | Action Items |
|---|
| :00 | Housekeeping | Karen | - Brief introductions.
- If you miss a meeting, the recordings are available here.
- Our liaison to the Sys Ops & Mgt SIG and Data Migration Sub-group is Tod.
Orientation/On-Boarding: |
|
| :10 | About the Group | Karen | Key concepts: - This is an open group–anyone can join.
- We should allow any sub-groups to be formed–no judgement.
- Important that we not duplicate efforts of other groups.
What is the purpose of the group? - In general the consensus was the the group should have a higher-level, coordination role
- It's an opportunity to step back from any one domain and look at things broadly
- There's also a desire to build community and identify people who can be resources for implementation
- This group can help facilitate that by providing a venue to ask questions and identifying the right people to answer them
- People should be encouraged to share questions and challenges from the gap analysis and their own implementation activities
|
|
| :20 | FOLIO Working Meeting | Karen | Should we plan a meeting Wednesday morning for face to face/Zoom? June 19 - Yes, we will have the majority of group members in attendance, so we will plan to meet.
Some possible goals/topics for the meeting include: - A round robin of updates from each implementer
- Sharing experiences with installation, testing, mapping, etc.
- Sharing experiences related to data clean up
- Brainstorming ideas for areas that the group can help support
- Identifying tools, documentation, or procedures we can develop
- Identifying tools that can be reused across institutions
- Following up on the feature prioritization/gap analysis
- Setting up a pipeline from the SIGs to the Implementation Group
|
|
| :40 | What should we tackle first? | Karen | How is the Feature Prioritization/Gap Analysis for 2019 work being done at your library? - Most people have one or more groups meeting regularly to discuss issues
- Alabama, Chalmers, and 5 Colleges met in person with EBSCO to talk through the features and are pretty close to done
- FLO had a kick-off meeting with Index Data to review requirements and are now working through the spreadsheet
- Duke has hired three analysts who are currently working on a review
There was a desire for this group to be involved in reviewing the results of the gap analysis and to put together a holistic view of our priorities as a community. Anya shared that the EBSCO implementers are entering their feature rankings directly into JIRA and have a dashboard to monitor new features coming in: Chalmers dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10505
U of A dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10517
FC dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10516 |
|