2019-04-09 Kickoff Meeting

2019-04-09 Kickoff Meeting

  • @Karen Newbery

  • @patty.wanninger

  • @Tod Olson

  • @Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated)

  • @Anya

  • @Deb Lamb

  • @Ingolf Kuss

  • Jackie Gottlieb

  • @Jenn Colt

  • @Jesse Koennecke

  • @Alexander Soto

  • @Kelly Drake

  • @Kirstin Kemner-Heek

  • @Lisa Sjögren (EBSCO)

  • @Former user (Deleted)

  • @Steve Bischof

  • @Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se)

  • @Tom Wilson

  • @Peter Murray

 

Time

Topic

Lead By

Notes

Action Items

Time

Topic

Lead By

Notes

Action Items

:00

Housekeeping

Karen

  • Brief introductions.

  • If you miss a meeting, the recordings are available here.

  • Our liaison to the Sys Ops & Mgt SIG and Data Migration Sub-group is Tod.

Orientation/On-Boarding:

 

:10

About the Group

Karen

Key concepts:

  • This is an open group–anyone can join.

  • We should allow any sub-groups to be formed–no judgement.

  • Important that we not duplicate efforts of other groups.

What is the purpose of the group?

  • In general the consensus was the the group should have a higher-level, coordination role

  • It's an opportunity to step back from any one domain and look at things broadly

  • There's also a desire to build community and identify people who can be resources for implementation

  • This group can help facilitate that by providing a venue to ask questions and identifying the right people to answer them

  • People should be encouraged to share questions and challenges from the gap analysis and their own implementation activities

 

:20

FOLIO Working Meeting

Karen

Should we plan a meeting Wednesday morning for face to face/Zoom? June 19

  • Yes, we will have the majority of group members in attendance, so we will plan to meet.

Some possible goals/topics for the meeting include:

  • A round robin of updates from each implementer

  • Sharing experiences with installation, testing, mapping, etc.

  • Sharing experiences related to data clean up

  • Brainstorming ideas for areas that the group can help support

  • Identifying tools, documentation, or procedures we can develop

  • Identifying tools that can be reused across institutions

  • Following up on the feature prioritization/gap analysis

  • Setting up a pipeline from the SIGs to the Implementation Group

 

:40

What should we tackle first?

Karen

How is the Feature Prioritization/Gap Analysis for 2019 work being done at your library?

  • Most people have one or more groups meeting regularly to discuss issues

  • Alabama, Chalmers, and 5 Colleges met in person with EBSCO to talk through the features and are pretty close to done

  • FLO had a kick-off meeting with Index Data to review requirements and are now working through the spreadsheet

  • Duke has hired three analysts who are currently working on a review

There was a desire for this group to be involved in reviewing the results of the gap analysis and to put together a holistic view of our priorities as a community.

Anya shared that the EBSCO implementers are entering their feature rankings directly into JIRA and have a dashboard to monitor new features coming in:

Chalmers dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10505
U of A dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10517
FC dashboard https://folio-org.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10516