Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 8
Next »
Date
Attendees
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes | Decisions and Actions |
---|
5 min | Announcements | all | No announcements |
|
15 min | Report from Hygiene subgroup | | General meeting organization and planning - decreased time of PC meeting to one hour
- cleaned up future topics page
- new column: decisions and actions to follow up on
Non-PC community member suggestions page
Time zone inclusiveness, etc.
Hygiene subgroup will meet next Wednesday again to discuss further steps Feedback: - reduction of meeting time works fine - we can still have good discussions
- Community topics: page can be advertised and we can see whether the table is fine or needs addition
- the PC columns will be highlighted as such
|
|
30 min | Follow up on Entity Management and MM SIG discussion | | Report on discussion at MM SIG after last week's PC meeting and next steps - Felix reports that MM would prefer to have Entity Management a subgroup or working group of MM
- example: ERM started as a subgroup of RM as well, so things can evolve
- the Community should have the option to get involved
- Laura is actively searching for people interested, no feedback so far
- Charlotte suggest to start a wiki page
- Laura: there is already a linked data wiki page - we should be careful to not confuse people
- Felix: another observation is that there is no good information flow back from subgroups to MM SIG
- a regular update would be needed
- there was the idea of an Inventory oversight committee
- not clear what the scope is and how long this would need to exists
- Inventory and Quickmarc should stay in MM
- but MM is open for other SIGs to provide input
- mod-search, everything related to MARC, SRS
- some things were developed without SME input, so the SIG should check for gaps
- Data import and export: MM will need to coordinat efforts to stay up to date, no matter whether it will be own SIG or subgroup
- Jennifer: for data export there is no active work; PC or MM could talk about whether a working group is needed
- we should gather feedback from Data import members
- Felix agrees
- Bulk edit manages data across FOLIO
- Jenn: for Data import there is another group formed, no pecific convener and no PO run working group
- group by users
- we need to understand what people get out of these groups
- User support group has a slack channel and a wiki page: Data Import Lab Sessions
- in different other SIGs there are assistant POs - would that be a way to help MM SIG
| Laura E Daniels to reach out to Alvaro Lopez to help organise the linked data wiki page and new Entitiy Management pages |
5 min | Future topics | |
|
|
Action items